What approaches have been used to implement direct payments within health systems, and how do various factors influence the effectiveness of these approaches in supporting personalisation, governance, and equitable access to care: A Rapid Evidence Summary
Gillen, E. C.; Csontos, J. K.; Edwards, D.; Edwards, A.; Lewis, R.
Show abstract
Continuing National Health Service Health Care (CHC) is a package of care for adults with significant primary health care needs who live in England or Wales. Currently, direct payments are not available for individuals receiving CHC in Wales. In contrast, in England, individuals in receipt of CHC can access direct payments as part of a broader system of Personal Health Budgets (PHBs), which offer choice and control over how their care is delivered. The Health and Social Care (Wales) Act 2025 includes provisions enabling the introduction of direct payments for CHC in Wales, with implementation anticipated in 2026, subject to the development of supporting regulations and guidance This review seeks to explore: what approaches have been used to implement direct payments within health systems, and how effective these approaches are in supporting personalisation, governance, and equitable access to care? Searches were conducted on bibliographic databases from 2012 onwards to build upon previous work. Important pre-2012 grey literature evidence was also considered. The review included evidence published from 2010 to 2023. The findings presented are based on the 8 review articles and 16 organisational reports, some of which cover both health and social care. The literature lacks clear definitions and consistent use of the terms related to direct payments and Personal Health Budgets (PHBs), often blurring the distinctions between different approaches. Where possible, findings have been drawn from the broader PHB literature, with relevant sections highlighted that directly address the implementation of direct payments. Many of the key elements for the successful implementation of direct payments are similar across the different models of PHB implementation and include: Robust support and referral systems, clear and accessible information for recipients (patients and families), comprehensive training and guidance for staff involved in implementation to enhance knowledge and attitudes. Policymakers should account for an initial adjustment period when assessing the impact of direct payments, as users and carers, as well as NHS staff, get used to any new arrangements and processes. Researchers should carefully consider the timing of data collection in evaluations of direct payments, as early-stage data may disproportionately reflect implementation challenges rather than long-term outcomes. Longer-term follow-up (minimum of nine months) is essential to capture the full impact of personalised care, allowing users time to adjust, build confidence, and develop sustainable routines that reflect the intended benefits. Funding statementThe authors and their Institutions were funded for this work by the Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, itself funded by Health and Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh Government.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Staff experiences and perspectives of delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 94%
- Understanding the influence of leadership, organisation, and policy on delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 93%
- Progressivity of out-of-pocket costs under Australia’s universal health care system: a national linked data study 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 94%
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 93%
- Emerging models and trends in mental health crisis care in England: a national investigation of crisis care systems 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 93%
- Understanding the roles and experiences of mental health peer support workers in England: a qualitative study 93%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A review of the effectiveness and experiences of welfare advice services co-located in health settings: a critical narrative systematic review 94%
- Loneliness during strict lockdown: trajectories and predictors during the COVID-19 pandemic in 38,217 adults in the UK 88%
- Participatory Approaches in Community Health in light of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review Protocol 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 92%
- Redeployment and training of healthcare professionals to Intensive Care during COVID-19: a systemic review 92%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.