Back

Nonmyeloablative Pentostatin-Cyclophosphamide Preconditioning Improves Rates of Engraftment in Adults Undergoing Haploidentical HCT for Sickle Cell Disease

Limerick, E.; Hsieh, M.; Grecco, M. L.; Varga, J.; Brooks, J.; Coles, W.; Queen, J.; Jeffries, N.; Fitzhugh, C.

2025-09-02 hematology
10.1101/2025.08.31.25334807 medRxiv
Show abstract

The morbidity and mortality of sickle cell disease (SCD) remain high. Novel nonmyeloablative haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) regimens are being proposed. MethodsThis report compared the effect of adding an oral cyclophosphamide and IV pentostatin (PC) preconditioning to the nonmyeloablative NIH HCT platform of alemtuzumab and total body irradiation (TBI). ResultsThirty-nine adult SCD patients were included. The median age was 33 years, 61% were male, and 92% were HbSS genotype. The median follow-up was 6.5 years. Many patients had severe end-organ damage, including dialysis-dependent end-stage kidney disease (10%) and cirrhosis (8%). One-year overall survival was 95%. The PC regimen was associated with a reduction in acute rejection one-year post-HCT (5% vs. 44%; p=0.004) and lower graft failure rates throughout the follow-up period. After a median follow-up of 5.2 years, the disease-free survival was 71% for the PC regimen. The PC preconditioning was associated with higher rates of full donor chimerism at 2-years post-HCT (0% vs. 43%; p=0.02). Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) rates were low; no patients developed moderate to severe chronic GVHD. There remain no cases of myeloid malignancy after PC. With the increased immunosuppression of PC, 23% of patients developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, 19% developed immune cytopenias, and 62% had viral reactivation. SummaryFurther study to determine an optimal nonmyeloablative haploidentical regimen for SCD patients with compromised organ function is imperative.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.