Back

Comparative Efficacy of Biologic Therapies for Plaque Psoriasis: A Network Meta-Analysis

Saleem, H.

2025-09-02 dermatology
10.1101/2025.08.31.25334775 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBiologics have significantly improved outcomes for patients with psoriasis. However, with multiple agents targeting different immunological pathways, comparative efficacy data is essential to guide optimal treatment selection. ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of eight biologic therapies in achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index 75 response in patients with plaque psoriasis. MethodsA systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted per PRISMA-NMA guidelines. Open-access randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults with plaque psoriasis treated with adalimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, bimekizumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, or tildrakizumab were included. Psoriasis Area Severity Index 75 at approximately 12 weeks was the primary outcome. A frequentist random-effects model was used Results29 RCTs (13923 participants) were included. 8 biologics were analyzed. All agents outperformed placebo. 11 of the combinations out of 325 had significant inconsistency. Transitivity assumptions based on randomization and study design were not addressed. Ixekizumab 80mg was the best treatment compared to placebo and all other biologics, while increasing dose of all drugs was not always associated with increasing efficacy except in the cases of Ustekinumab

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.