Impact of Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Quality of Life in End-Stage Heart Failure Patients: A Comprehensive Assessment
Khan, R.; Jilakaraju, B.; dhall, s.; Vaspari, S. K.; Allada, S. S.; Mupparaju, J. S.; Reddy, S. T.; Muneer, A.; Kumari, K.; Bodapati, N.; Waghmode, A.; Ramteke, H. D.; Juneja, M.
Show abstract
IntroductionHeart failure (HF) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, and heart transplantation remains the gold standard treatment. However, due to the scarcity of donor organs, Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) have emerged as a critical alternative for patients with advanced HF. LVADs can serve as a bridge to transplantation or a long-term solution for that ineligible for a transplant. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of LVADs, focusing on survival outcomes, adverse events, and quality of life. MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar from 2000 to August 2025, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The studies included were randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and observational studies evaluating LVAD outcomes in patients with end-stage heart failure. Data on survival rates, adverse events, and quality of life were extracted and pooled for statistical analysis using the Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) model in Stata 18.0. ResultsThe pooled analysis showed that LVAD implantation improved survival and functional outcomes. Survival at 1 month post-implantation showed no significant improvement (odds-ratio [OR] = 0.06, 95% CI [-0.12, 0.23]), with low heterogeneity (I{superscript 2} = 0%, {tau}{superscript 2} = 0.00). At 2 months, the pooled OR was 0.09 (95% CI [-0.16, 0.34]) indicating no significant effect on survival. After 6 months, survival outcomes remained non-significant (OR = 0.12, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.33]). However, LVADs significantly improved functional capacity, with a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) showing a 74 {+/-} 141 meter improvement (Starling et al., 2017). Adverse events, including bleeding,neurological issues, and thrombosis, were common. The risk of bleeding was significantly increased (risk-ratio [RR] = 1.87, 95% CI [0.94, 2.80]). ConclusionLVADs are a valuable intervention for end-stage heart failure, offering substantial improvements in functional capacity and quality of life. While survival benefits were modest, the devices significantly enhance the well-being of patients ineligible for heart transplantation. However, the risks of adverse events remain, highlighting the need for careful management. Future advancements in LVAD technology are essential to optimize long-term outcomes and reduce complications, ensuring that LVADs remain a viable treatment option for patients with advanced heart failure.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of successful weaning from Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-A ECMO): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 95%
- Impact of left ventricular assist devices and heart transplant on acute myocardial infarction and heart failure mortality and readmission measures 94%
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Smartwatch Facilitated Remote Health Care for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Amid COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 93%
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inpatient Outcomes Of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Bridging to Transplantation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 94%
- Early left ventricular systolic function is a more sensitive predictor of adverse events after heart transplant 92%
- Application of severity classification after return of spontaneous circulation for predicting long-term outcomes in cardiac arrest survivors 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes among patients greater than and less than 80 years undergoing TAVR 94%
- Referral for Cardiac Amyloidosis in Patients who underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Result of Quality Outcome Project 92%
- Hospitalist perspectives of available tests to monitor volume status in patients with heart failure: a qualitative study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Screening for Right Ventricular Dysfunction in the Emergency Department Using a Smartphone ECG Analysis Application: An External Validation Study with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients 92%
- Centhaquine Increases Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output in Patients with Hypovolemic Shock 91%
- Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation among Cancer Patients: Utilization Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.