Back

Computational analysis of therapeutic potential for simplified Piper. spp- derived medicinal mixtures in anxiety, sleep, pain and seizure.

Rice, B.; Wooton, B.; Jansen, C.; Howard, J.; Nixon, J.; Ellis, L.; Rogers, A.; Adra, C. N.; Stokes, A. J.; Aporosa, A.; Small-Howard, A. L.; Turner, H.

2025-09-04 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2025.08.29.673131 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phytomedicines have played a vital role in traditional medical systems globally, particularly in providing culturally relevant and accessible healthcare solutions. Piper methysticum, known as Kava, is a traditional Pacific Island phytomedicine with clinically validated anxiolytic properties, primarily attributed to its Kavalactones. However, the biogeographically restricted distribution of Piper methysticum and the ecological and cultural concerns surrounding its widespread adoption highlight the need to explore alternative sources within the Piper genus. This study investigates whether other species within the Piper genus, used phytomedically in non-Pacific contexts, exhibit similar therapeutic efficacy for anxiety, stress, and related disorders including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). We employed a computational approach utilizing a novel data platform of non-Western phytomedical pharmacopeias to analyze the secondary metabolomes of various Piper species. Network analysis and multidimensional data projections were used to compare the chemical composition and therapeutic indications of these species with those of Piper methysticum. Our findings suggest that while Kavalactones are predominantly unique to Piper methysticum, other Piper species also contain bioactive compounds associated with anxiolytic and stress-relieving effects. These results provide insight into the potential for culturally and biogeographically contextualized approaches to PTSD treatment, beyond the exclusive use of Kava, and lay the groundwork for future research into alternative phytomedicinal therapies within the Piper genus.

Published in Frontiers in Pharmacology (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.