Back

A novel rat spatial transitive inference paradigm for investigating memory schema and deliberation

Porter, B. S.; Shi, C.; Kozlova, E.; Jadhav, S. P.

2025-09-03 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.08.28.672785 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Inferential reasoning is a vital cognitive ability that enables animals to navigate novel situations by leveraging existing relational knowledge of memory schema, with hypothesized roles of prefrontal cortical - hippocampal circuits. Transitive inference (TI) tasks test the ability of subjects to infer relationships within a value hierarchy (e.g., A>B>C>D>E) after being trained only on adjacent premise pairs (e.g., A-B, B-C, etc.). In rodents, current TI paradigms are primarily based on odor-cues and have several limitations that preclude investigation of physiological mechanisms underlying schemas and deliberation. To address these challenges, we developed a novel, automated spatial TI task for rats using a radial maze with maze arms as premise elements and a dedicated deliberation zone. Most rats successfully learned the premise pairs over training. Further, animals demonstrated rapid, successful inference (test pair B>D and control pair A>E) within a single test session, with higher initial accuracy than comparable premise pairs, indicating the use of schema-based inference. We also investigated vicarious trial and errors (VTE), a behavioral correlate of spatial deliberation. VTE behavior was elevated on choice trajectories early in learning, when novel premise pairs were introduced, and generally for incorrect trials, corresponding to the hypothesized association of VTEs with uncertainty. Further, rats also exhibited elevated VTE behavior with high variability during inference testing, with individual variability suggestive of varying strengths of schema usage. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of a rodent spatial TI task that provides new insights into the behavioral correlates of schemas and deliberation for inferential reasoning.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.0%
3
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.2%
5
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
8
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.5%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
13
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.6%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
18
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
21
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%