Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review, Meta-Regression, and Network Meta-Analysis
Juneja, M.; Khan, R.; Sharma, G.; Nadkarni, N. A.; Gandhi, A.; Chidurala, R.; Uddin, M. S.; Sharma, S.; Ambala, M.; Jilakraju, B.; Noor Ain, S. H.; Ramteke, H. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundPatients with both atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) face a difficult clinical trade-off: they need protection from stroke but are at higher risk of bleeding. With more anticoagulant options now available, especially among newer oral agents, its unclear which offers the safest and most effective choice in this high-risk group. MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials involving adults with AF and CKD. We searched five major databases, focusing on three key outcomes: all-cause mortality, stroke or systemic embolism, and significant bleeding. Analyses were performed using MetaInsight in R, and risk of bias was assessed using Cochranes RoB 2.0 tool. ResultsWe included 29 trials with over 187,000 participants. Apixaban stood out across outcomes, showing the lowest risk of all-cause mortality (OR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.22-0.92) and stroke/systemic embolism (OR 0.39; 95% CI: 0.25-0.62), along with a favorable bleeding profile. Asundexian, a newer factor XIa inhibitor, showed some early promise in lowering stroke risk, but theres still not enough evidence to know how safe it really is. In contrast, warfarin and aspirin repeatedly came up short, providing less protection and carrying more risk than the newer options. These patterns remained consistent across all sensitivity and subgroup analyses. ConclusionAmong the available options, apixaban stands out as offering the most dependable mix of safety and effectiveness for patients with both AF and CKD. While newer drugs like asundexian show potential, we still need more data, particularly in those with advanced CKD, before they can be confidently recommended. In the end, treatment decisions should be tailored to each patient, taking into account their risks, kidney function, and personal needs in this complex setting.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The usefulness of D-dimer as a predictive marker for mortality in patients with COVID-19 hospitalized during the first wave in Italy 94%
- Confounding adjustment performance of ordinal analysis methods in stroke studies 94%
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy alone after cryptogenic stroke 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- OpenSAFELY: impact of national guidance on switching from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in early phase of COVID-19 pandemic in England 93%
- Anticoagulation trends in adults aged 65 and over with atrial fibrillation; a cohort study 93%
- Comparison of troponin and natriuretic peptides in takotsubo syndrome and acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants Affect Activated Clotting Time During and Bleeding Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 95%
- Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel: the Impact of Platelet Inhibition on Cerebrovascular Microembolic Events during TAVR 94%
- Risk of Cardiovascular Events after Covid-19: a double-cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal adherence thresholds for oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation using machine learning and population administrative data 94%
- Coagulation factor XII, XI, and VIII activity levels and secondary events after first ischemic stroke 92%
- A Novel Risk Assessment Model Predicts Major Bleeding Risk at Admission in Medical Inpatients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of survival in patients with ischemic stroke and active cancer: A prospective, multicenter, observational study 93%
- Tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg in moderate and severe acute ischemic stroke: A pooled analysis of NOR-TEST & NOR-TEST 2A 93%
- A claims-based score for the prediction of bleeding in a contemporary cohort of patients receiving oral anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.