Smartphone-based App to Assess Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Adenekan, R. A. G.; Adenekan, A. E.; Leung, K. K.; Muppidi, S.; Sakamuri, S.; Tan, M.; Tsai, S. A.; Osikomaiya, M.; Okamura, A. M.; Nunez, C. M.; Kim, S. H.; Yoshida, K. T.
Show abstract
BackgroundDiabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) affects approximately 50% of individuals with diabetes and is a risk factor for amputations. Unfortunately, foot exams and screening tools are inconsistent and miss early-stage nerve damage. A smartphone-based application that delivers controlled vibrations, records patient responses, and computes a vibration perception thresh-old (SVPT) may present an accessible, precise monitoring avenue. This study assesses the clinical relevance and precision of SVPTs for measuring large-fiber sensory deficits in patients with diabetes. MethodsWe measured SVPTs in 71 patients with pre-diabetes or diabetes and compared their efficacy with tuning fork exams. We analyzed the correlation between SVPT and Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork (RSTF) scores, along with their relationship with clinical DPN markers such as hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), age, and disease duration using multivariable linear regression. ResultsSVPTs moderately correlated with RSTF scores (Rs = -0.43, p = 0.0019). Among adults aged 50 to 69, SVPTs correlated significantly with clinical markers (F (4, 29) = 4.76, p = 0.00447, Multiple R2 = 0.396, Adjusted R2 = 0.313,{varepsilon} = 0.167). The interaction between age and HbA1c was positively associated with SVPTs ({beta} = 0.118, p = 0.001), while SVPTs were negatively associated with diabetes duration ({beta} = -0.098, p = 0.003). ConclusionsWe present a clinically relevant, patient-operated smartphone application for large-fiber sensory monitoring, tested on patients with varying DPN risk. This novel platform has the potential to provide a precise, reliable, and accessible avenue for identifying individuals at risk of developing DPN complications, prior to overt clinical manifestation.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of an artificial intelligence-based smartphone app for guided reading of SARS-CoV-2 lateral-flow immunoassays 89%
- Initial Experience in Predicting the Risk of Hospitalization of 496 Outpatients with COVID-19 Using a Telemedicine Risk Assessment Tool 88%
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes in diabetes patients admitted with COVID-19 in Dubai: a cross-sectional single centre study. 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sense-checking the approach to quantitative sensory testing to detect chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy 93%
- Validity and reliability of an app-based medical device to empower individuals in evaluating their physical capacities 93%
- Comparison of raw accelerometry data from ActiGraph, Apple Watch, Garmin, and Fitbit using a mechanical shaker table 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Image Transcription for Perinatal Blood Pressure Monitoring Using Mobile Health Technology 93%
- Racial disparities in continuous glucose monitoring-based 60-min glucose predictions among people with type 1 diabetes 92%
- Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Ramp protocol: Uncovering individual differences in walking to an auditory beat using TeensyStep 93%
- Ambulatory physiological measures obtained under naturalistic urban mobility conditions have acceptable reliability 92%
- A sweat lactate sensor for detecting anaerobic threshold in patients with heart failure: a prospective clinical trial (LacS-001) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical interpretation of machine learning models for prediction of diabetic complications using electronic health records 91%
- Evaluation of a Machine Learning Approach Utilizing Wearable Data for Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Workers 91%
- Trajectories: a framework for detecting temporal clinical event sequences from health data standardized to the OMOP Common Data Model 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.