Slower transitions between control states lead to reductions in cognitive flexibility over the lifespan
Grahek, I.; Leng, X.; Fengler, A.; Shenhav, A.
Show abstract
Declines in cognitive flexibility are a hallmark of cognitive aging, but their causes remain elusive. Here, we examine a previously untested source of aging-related cognitive inflexibility, building on a dynamical systems framework for flexible cognition. We propose that cognitive inflexibility can arise in part from slower transitions through the space of distinct configurations of cognitive control needed to pursue different goals. To test this model, we had participants across the lifespan (aged 19-88) perform a cognitive task under different performance goals, each of which induced a different configuration of cognitive control. Using computational modeling, we measured dynamic changes in two control signals (attentional focus and response caution) as participants pursued distinct goals. This allowed us to test three potential sources of age-related decreases in cognitive flexibility: 1) diminished control capacity in environments that require more goal switching; 2) diminished range of control adjustments; and 3) slower transitions between control configurations. Of these, we found that age was only associated with transition speed. When given sufficient time to maintain a given goal, older adults were able to adjust control to a similar extent as younger adults. However, older adults were more likely to undershoot their target control configuration when frequently switching between goals, consistent with longer transition times between configurations. Our findings demonstrate the critical role that cognitive dynamics play in explaining the mechanisms through which cognitive inflexibility arises in older adulthood. SignificanceMeeting the shifting demands of daily life requires a person to constantly adjust the way in which they allocate their cognitive resources. As people get older, it becomes increasingly difficult to achieve the same levels of cognitive flexibility. We show that these deficits can be explained by age-related changes in the dynamics governing adjustments between cognitive states. Older adults take longer to adapt their cognitive state to a new goal, despite demonstrating preserved ability to reach desired states when given sufficient time. These findings validate a new model of cognitive flexibility and its variability across individuals, including forms of inflexibility seen in healthy aging and across a range of psychiatric and neurological disorders.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cortical grey matter mediates increases in model-based control and learning from positive feedback from adolescence to adulthood 95%
- Modulation of motor vigour by expectation of reward probability trial-by-trial is preserved in healthy ageing and Parkinson's disease patients 95%
- Dissociable neural systems support the learning and transfer of hierarchical control structure 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large Reaching Datasets Quantify the Impact of Age, Sex/Gender, and Experience on Motor Control 95%
- The Temporal Dynamics of Metacognitive Experiences Track Rational Adaptations in Task Performance 94%
- The vertical position of visual information conditions spatial memory performance in healthy aging 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning to blink strategically is crucial to performance in a predictable saccade task and varies across the lifespan 96%
- Confidence and insight into working memories are shaped by attention and recent performance 93%
- Gains and Losses Affect Learning Differentially at Low and High Attentional Load 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.