Addressing challenges in selecting dietary risk factor-outcome pairs for health impact assessments: Developing an evidence database and novel approach to dose-response extraction
Jacob, A. E.; Denos, C.; Boone, L.; Cooreman-Algoed, M.; Dewulf, J.; Jakobsen, M. U.; Vandevijvere, S.; Pires, S. M.; Jakobsen, L. S.
Show abstract
Dietary health impact assessments are valuable decision-support tools for action on population-wide dietary shifts. These assessments rely on epidemiological evidence to estimate associations between dietary risk factors and health outcomes. However, the review and selection of evidence poses several challenges including a lack of systematic approaches to risk-outcome pair selection and ability to extract harmonised dose-response data from scientific papers. To address these challenges, this work aimed to 1) develop a database of dietary risk factor dose-response curves by updating the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023 (NNR2023) evidence base and 2) propose a novel extraction method for non-linear dose-response curves. The NNR2023 scoping review methodology was replicated and risk-outcome pairs were selected according to modified NNR 2023 criteria. Non-linear relationships were estimated by extracting data points with an open-source graph reader and fitting piecewise constant functions to the extracted points. From the selected updated studies and original NNR2023 evidence, 101 risk-outcome associations were included, of which 44 were non-linear, and one quarter included beverages. Around half of the associations reported levels of at least mid-range evidence certainty. The provided database and methodology contribute to increased transparency and provide a standard approach to evidence selection and use in health impact assessments.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the dietary and health impact of implementing mandatory front-of-package nutrient disclosures in the US: a policy scenario modeling analysis 95%
- A methodological framework for deriving the German food-based dietary guidelines 2024: food groups, nutrient goals, and objective functions 94%
- Relevance of Mediterranean diet as a nutritional strategy in diminishing COVID-19 risk: A systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Methods used to select results to include in meta-analyses of nutrition research: a meta-research study 96%
- Characteristics and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of prevalence studies in adult populations: a meta-epidemiological study 92%
- Quantitative bias analysis methods for summary level epidemiologic data in the peer-reviewed literature: a systematic review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Methodological quality of recommendations on vitamin D and calcium – a systematic review of bone health guidelines 93%
- The effects of time-restricted eating vs. standard dietary advice on weight, metabolic health and the consumption of processed food: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial in community-based adults 92%
- Efficacy and Safety of Habitual Consumption of a Food Supplement Containing Miraculin in Malnourished Cancer Patients: the CLINMIR Pilot Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN): elaboration and examples 91%
- Estimating The Health And Economic Effects Of The Voluntary Sodium Reduction Targets In Brazil: Microsimulation Analysis 90%
- Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The methodologies to assess the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review 89%
- Associations of polygenic inheritance of physical activity with aerobic fitness, cardiometabolic risk factors and diseases: the HUNT Study 88%
- Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.