Back

Addressing challenges in selecting dietary risk factor-outcome pairs for health impact assessments: Developing an evidence database and novel approach to dose-response extraction

Jacob, A. E.; Denos, C.; Boone, L.; Cooreman-Algoed, M.; Dewulf, J.; Jakobsen, M. U.; Vandevijvere, S.; Pires, S. M.; Jakobsen, L. S.

2025-08-28 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.08.27.25333764 medRxiv
Show abstract

Dietary health impact assessments are valuable decision-support tools for action on population-wide dietary shifts. These assessments rely on epidemiological evidence to estimate associations between dietary risk factors and health outcomes. However, the review and selection of evidence poses several challenges including a lack of systematic approaches to risk-outcome pair selection and ability to extract harmonised dose-response data from scientific papers. To address these challenges, this work aimed to 1) develop a database of dietary risk factor dose-response curves by updating the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023 (NNR2023) evidence base and 2) propose a novel extraction method for non-linear dose-response curves. The NNR2023 scoping review methodology was replicated and risk-outcome pairs were selected according to modified NNR 2023 criteria. Non-linear relationships were estimated by extracting data points with an open-source graph reader and fitting piecewise constant functions to the extracted points. From the selected updated studies and original NNR2023 evidence, 101 risk-outcome associations were included, of which 44 were non-linear, and one quarter included beverages. Around half of the associations reported levels of at least mid-range evidence certainty. The provided database and methodology contribute to increased transparency and provide a standard approach to evidence selection and use in health impact assessments.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.