Antitachycardia Pacing is More Effective When Delivered to the Left Bundle Branch Area Compared to the Right Ventricle in a Pre-clinical Model of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia
Offei, E.; Ishidoya, Y.; Smego, D.; Castillo, S. R.; Khan, M. S.; Yazaki, K.; Shah, A.; Vaziri, A. Y.; Lange, M.; Hirahara, A.; Li, H.; Stoddard, G.; Ranjan, R.; Dosdall, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundAnti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) delivered from implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) provides critically timed pacing pulses to terminate ventricular tachycardia (VT). Physiological pacing through left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing has emerged as a clinically relevant alternative to induce synchronous activation of the ventricles. The main objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ATP delivered to an LBBA lead and a conventional RV lead. MethodsUsing a preclinical animal model (n=7), pacing leads were implanted in the RV apex and LBBA and connected to ICDs. The left anterior descending artery was occluded for two hours to cause an ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Four days following IRI, VT episodes were induced using programmed electrical stimulation (PES), and burst ATP therapy was delivered to the RV or LBBA leads for each VT episode. ResultsVT was induced 80 times, with a mean VT cycle length (VT CL) of 180.0{+/-}30.0 ms. ATP delivered to the LBBA terminated VT more often than RV ATP (70.2% vs 47.3%, P = 0.04), and there was no significant difference in negative outcomes of VT acceleration or VF induction. Activation sequences from the basket catheter were determined for the pre-therapy VT and captured ATP beats, and correlation coefficients were computed to the activation sequences during ATP delivery. The number of ATP pulses required for the activation sequences to correlate with the captured ATP pattern rather than the pre-therapy VT pattern was lower for LBBA ATP compared to RV ATP (4.1 vs. 5.1 beats, P = 0.04). Successful LBBA ATP demonstrated earlier and more frequent Purkinje activations preceding myocardial activation than successful RV ATP. ConclusionImproved performance of LBBA ATP compared to RV ATP provides further incentive for the wide use of LBBA leads in patients who need cardiac electrotherapy.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High-resolution Spatiotemporal Changes in Dominant Frequency and Structural Organization During Persistent Atrial Fibrillation 95%
- Effects of low versus high inspired oxygen fraction on myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A randomized clinical trial 94%
- Ventricular anatomical complexity and gender differences impact predictions from computational models 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Ventricular Tachycardia Circuits in Patients with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy using Genotype-specific Heart Digital Twins 94%
- Personalized Computational Modeling Identifies Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Patients with Potential Arrhythmic Substrate 94%
- Cardiac electrophysiological remodeling associated with enhanced arrhythmia susceptibility in a canine model of elite exercise 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of electrophysiological left bundle branch pacing characteristics in different bilateral electrode pacing vector configurations 96%
- Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and Troponin Elevation in COVID-19 94%
- Autologous cardiac micrografts as support therapy to coronary artery bypass surgery 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transmural and rate-dependent profiling of drug-induced arrhythmogenic risks through in silico simulations of multichannel pharmacology 94%
- Premature Ventricular Contractions During the Recovery Phase of Exercise Are Only Associated with Increased Cardiovascular Mortality when Present Together with Echocardiographic Abnormalities 93%
- Improved evaluation of left ventricular hypertrophy using the spatial QRS-T angle by electrocardiography 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.