Back

Estimating changes in RNA Polymerase II elongation and intron splicing speeds from total RNA-seq data

Koubele, J.; Beyer, A.

2025-08-28 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.08.24.672013 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We present a computational method to jointly estimate changes in the elongation speed of RNA Polymerase II, and the speed of intron splicing, using total RNA-seq. An implementation of our method is available at https://github.com/jkoubele/pol-ii-speed.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
34.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.1%
Similar papers in this journal
3
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.9%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.1%
Similar papers in this journal
5
RNA
● 189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
7
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.4%
9
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.2%
11
Journal of Computational Biology
○ 48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
15
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
○ 230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
18
Molecular Biology and Evolution
◐ 542 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.6%
20
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.