Back

Impact of cannabis use on health outcomes and prescription benzodiazepine use

Singh, N.; Dai, Y.; Wilkinson, S.; Rhee, T. G.; RADHAKRISHNAN, R.

2025-08-26 health policy
10.1101/2025.08.23.25334295 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveWith the rising misuse of benzodiazepine (BZD) and associated overdose deaths, cannabis has been touted as a potential substitute with proposed benefit of better health outcomes. This two-year retrospective analysis examined whether cannabis use among BZD users was associated with changes in outcomes of (1) all-cause mortality, (2) hospitalizations, (3) emergency department (ED) visits, and (4) whether it demonstrated BZD-sparing effects on prescription quantity over time. MethodsUsing data from Yale New Haven Health System, we conducted a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study among BZD users. Cannabis use was the primary exposure, with BZD users without cannabis exposure as controls. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting and propensity score matching techniques, cohorts were balanced at baseline adjusting for medical comorbidities, socioeconomic status and other clinical factors. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were examined with four outcomes of interest. ResultsThe sample included 1,026 patients with 60.3% females and mean age was 54.2. There was no significant effect of cannabis use on BZD quantity. Cannabis use was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality, hospitalization, or ED visits. In exploratory analysis, medical cannabis users had a lower risk of all-cause mortality but greater risk for hospitalizations among those aged < 50 years. ConclusionIn this longitudinal cohort study, cannabis use was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality, hospitalization and ED visits, or benzodiazepine dose reduction. Our results do not support a benzodiazepine-sparing effect for cannabis use.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.