Back

Longitudinal ctDNA Surveillance in Older Women with ER+ Breast Cancer to Facilitate Surgical De-Escalation: A Prospective, Hybrid-Decentralized Trial with Correlative Studies

Carleton, N.; Chang, A. C.; Chen, F.; Puhalla, S.; Foldi, J.; Waltermire, H.; Tin, A.; Cowher, M. S.; Lupinacci, K.; Diego, E. J.; Sabih, Q.; Johnson, R. R.; Malhotra, M.; Laubenthal, A.; Gorantla, V.; Balic, M.; Bhargava, R.; Joy, M.; Freeman, T.; Bridges, C.; Kalashnikova, E.; Rodriguez, A.; Liu, M. C.; Oesterreich, S.; Lee, A. V.; McAuliffe, P. F.

2025-08-24 oncology
10.1101/2025.08.23.25332468 medRxiv
Show abstract

For older patients with competing comorbidities, optimizing oncologic therapies is of paramount importance. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a validated prognostic factor across solid tumors and may provide a strategy to identify patients for whom safe de-escalation of certain therapies is possible. In this prospective, hybrid-decentralized trial (n = 43 patients; NCT05914792) that integrated clinical outcomes, patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes, and correlative tissue analysis, the primary objective was to determine if ctDNA levels were associated with tumor progression in older patients who opted to forgo breast cancer surgery in favor of primary endocrine therapy (pET). ctDNA levels were highly concordant with imaging findings, and a lack of ctDNA clearance at 6 months was associated with tumor progression. In a competing risk regression adjusted for patient age, tumor stage, tumor grade, and tumor Ki-67, pre-treatment ctDNA positivity was associated with a significant risk of tumor progression (HR 30, 95% CI 4.4-209; p = 0.0005). No patients with pre-treatment ctDNA negativity experienced tumor progression. In correlative analyses examining ctDNA-positive tumors progressing on pET, we identified populations of CD11+ T cell-interacting macrophages that upregulate CD109 and CD89 and secrete immunosuppressive chemokines to create a favorable environment for cancer epithelial cell proliferation. These findings suggest that ctDNA may be a surveillance modality for older patients who receive pET, warranting future evaluation in a randomized setting. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCEClinical management of older women with breast cancer can be challenging, and some women may opt to forego surgery through shared decision making with their physicians. Use of ctDNA for these patients may identify those at an increased risk for progression as well as those with endocrine-sensitive tumors who are good candidates for surgical de-escalation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
9
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
11
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
13
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
20
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
22
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
24
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
26
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
27
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%