Back

Longitudinal ctDNA Surveillance in Older Women with ER+ Breast Cancer to Facilitate Surgical De-Escalation: A Prospective, Hybrid-Decentralized Trial with Correlative Studies

Carleton, N.; Chang, A. C.; Chen, F.; Puhalla, S.; Foldi, J.; Waltermire, H.; Tin, A.; Cowher, M. S.; Lupinacci, K.; Diego, E. J.; Sabih, Q.; Johnson, R. R.; Malhotra, M.; Laubenthal, A.; Gorantla, V.; Balic, M.; Bhargava, R.; Joy, M.; Freeman, T.; Bridges, C.; Kalashnikova, E.; Rodriguez, A.; Liu, M. C.; Oesterreich, S.; Lee, A. V.; McAuliffe, P. F.

2025-08-24 oncology
10.1101/2025.08.23.25332468 medRxiv
Show abstract

For older patients with competing comorbidities, optimizing oncologic therapies is of paramount importance. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a validated prognostic factor across solid tumors and may provide a strategy to identify patients for whom safe de-escalation of certain therapies is possible. In this prospective, hybrid-decentralized trial (n = 43 patients; NCT05914792) that integrated clinical outcomes, patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes, and correlative tissue analysis, the primary objective was to determine if ctDNA levels were associated with tumor progression in older patients who opted to forgo breast cancer surgery in favor of primary endocrine therapy (pET). ctDNA levels were highly concordant with imaging findings, and a lack of ctDNA clearance at 6 months was associated with tumor progression. In a competing risk regression adjusted for patient age, tumor stage, tumor grade, and tumor Ki-67, pre-treatment ctDNA positivity was associated with a significant risk of tumor progression (HR 30, 95% CI 4.4-209; p = 0.0005). No patients with pre-treatment ctDNA negativity experienced tumor progression. In correlative analyses examining ctDNA-positive tumors progressing on pET, we identified populations of CD11+ T cell-interacting macrophages that upregulate CD109 and CD89 and secrete immunosuppressive chemokines to create a favorable environment for cancer epithelial cell proliferation. These findings suggest that ctDNA may be a surveillance modality for older patients who receive pET, warranting future evaluation in a randomized setting. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCEClinical management of older women with breast cancer can be challenging, and some women may opt to forego surgery through shared decision making with their physicians. Use of ctDNA for these patients may identify those at an increased risk for progression as well as those with endocrine-sensitive tumors who are good candidates for surgical de-escalation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.6%
2
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
3
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
5
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
6
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
7
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.5%
9
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
11
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
13
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.3%
15
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
18
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
24
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%