Back

Resting-state EEG oscillations are reduced in asymptomatic C9orf72 repeat expansion carriers

Dukic, S.; van Veenhuijzen, K.; Michielsen, A.; Westeneng, H.-J.; van den Berg, L. H.

2025-08-21 neurology
10.1101/2025.08.19.25333576 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveWe investigated the signature of the C9orf72 repeat expansion on resting-state cortical activity in asymptomatic individuals and explored its relationship with structural, gene expression, and cognitive measures. MethodsHigh-density resting-state EEG was compared between 90 asymptomatic family members of patients with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), dichotomised into carriers of the pathological C9orf72 repeat expansion (N = 37) and non-carrier controls (N = 53). Periodic (oscillatory) and aperiodic (1/f) components of the power spectrum were analysed at the sensor- and source-level. Regional EEG power changes were correlated with C9orf72 expression from the Allen Human Brain Atlas, cortical MRI thickness and performance on the Complementary Cognitive ALS Screen (C-CAS). ResultsAsymptomatic carriers exhibited significantly lower periodic power in the and {beta} frequency bands (10-30 Hz) across posterior cortical regions, including the parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes. The magnitude of this power reduction was associated with increased C9orf72 expression and reduced cortical thickness in the same regions. In carriers, reduced {beta}-band power was associated with poorer performance on Visuoconstructive Immediate and Body Representation tasks. The aperiodic component of the EEG power did not differ between groups. InterpretationIn asymptomatic C9orf72 repeat expansion carriers, resting-state EEG reveals differences in oscillatory power in the posterior brain regions. The correlational findings suggest that C9orf72 repeat expansion may be involved in functional and structural changes in the posterior cerebral cortex, which may contribute to deficits in tasks requiring visuospatial processing.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.