Unveiling Novel Molecular Drivers in Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis: Multi-Omics Integration Identifies Downregulation of VCAN and Emerging Roles of ASCL2/GRAMD1A as Prognostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities
Rastad, H.; Seifi Alan, M.; Jalilian, A.; Seifi Alan, S.; Hoseini, S.; Rashidi, H.; hosseini, k.; Seifi Alan, M.
Show abstract
PurposeBreast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) presents a major clinical challenge, driven by molecular mechanisms that remain poorly characterized. Patients and methodsThree RNA-seq datasets (GSE110590, GSE193103, GSE209998) were analyzed to identify BCBM-associated genes. Survival outcomes (2,976 primary tumors) were assessed via Kaplan-Meier (KM Plotter), genetic alterations via cBioPortal, pathways/networks via GeneMANIA/SIGNOR, and miRNA-mRNA interactions via miRNet. Drug candidates were prioritized using the CTD. ResultsTNFRSF9 and VCAN were downregulated (log2FC: -1.18 to -2.63), while GRAMD1A, ASCL2, TACC3, and PFKFB4 were upregulated (log2FC: +1.02 to +1.70). High PFKFB4 (HR=1.71) and TACC3 (HR=1.46) predicted poor survival, with VCAN suppression (Fold change (Fc) =0.24) and GRAMD1A elevation (Fc=1.31) confirmed in metastases. Pathways included ECM remodeling (VCAN), metabolic rewiring (PFKFB4), and mitotic instability (TACC3). miR-210-3p (hypoxia) and miR-27a-3p (angiogenesis) drove BCBM, countered by miR-335/34a. Drug candidates: Valproic Acid (TACC3/ASCL2), Vorinostat (VCAN), and CDK4/6 inhibitors. ConclusionThis study identifies TNFRSF9, VCAN, GRAMD1A, ASCL2, TACC3, and PFKFB4 as key drivers of BCBM, with dysregulation linked to immune evasion, metabolic adaptation, and mitotic instability. Prioritized miRNAs (e.g., miR-210-3p) and repurposed drugs (e.g., Valproic Acid, Vorinostat) offer actionable therapeutic strategies. These findings advance precision approaches for BCBM, pending preclinical validation to translate targets into clinical practice.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clustering of HR+/HER2- breast cancer in an Asian cohort is driven by immune phenotypes 95%
- Targeting tumor-stromal interactions in triple-negative breast cancer using a human vascularized micro-tumor model 95%
- Claudin-low-like mouse mammary tumors show distinct transcriptomic patterns uncoupled from genomic drivers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protein profiling of breast carcinomas reveals expression of immune-suppressive factors and signatures relevant to patient outcome 95%
- Heterogeneity in signaling pathway activity within primary and between primary and metastatic breast cancer 94%
- NDRG1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in inflammatory breast cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The association between plasma chemokines and breast cancer risk and prognosis: A Mendelian randomization study 92%
- Computing Skin Cutaneous Melanoma Outcome from the HLA-alleles and Clinical Characteristics 90%
- Analysis and Identification of Necroptosis Landscape on Therapy and Prognosis in Bladder Cancer 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Receptor for Hyaluronan-Mediated Motility (RHAMM) defines an invasive niche associated with tumor progression and predicts poor outcomes in breast cancer patients. 94%
- Spatial Effects of Infiltrating T cells on Neighbouring Cancer Cells and Prognosis in Stage III CRC patients 93%
- Chemokine profiling of melanoma-macrophage crosstalk identifies CCL8 and CCL15 as prognostic factors in cutaneous melanoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wnt signaling promotes inflammation and EMT-associated gene expression in mesenchymal TNBC 95%
- Proteogenomic Characterization of Triple-Negative Apocrine Carcinoma Reveals Molecular Features of Progression and Chemotherapy Response 95%
- Large-scale pan-cancer analysis reveals broad prognostic association between TGF-β ligands, not Hedgehog, and GLI1/2 expression in tumors 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.