Optimal annual hospital volume for open surgical repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a protocol of systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
Kanemaru, E.; Sasaki, K.; Miyake, T.; Mihara, T.
Show abstract
IntroductionCentralization of open surgical repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has been advocated to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. To promote centralization, it is essential to establish an evidence-based optimal threshold for annual number of procedures performed at each hospital. This review aims to conduct a dose-response meta-analysis to determine the optimal annual hospital volume for open AAA repairs. Methods and analysisThis protocol was developed in accordance with the 2015 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. We will include all prospective or retrospective cohort studies evaluating a volume-outcome relationship in open AAA repairs, provided they report at least two distinct hospital volumes. Studies reporting only a single hospital volume or focusing solely on surgeon-specific volumes will be excluded. Relevant studies will be searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to 13 August 2025, without language restrictions. Three authors will independently screen and select eligible studies, extract relevant data, and assess the risk of bias. The primary outcome is short-term mortality, defined as in-hospital and/or 30-day mortality, analyzed in relation to annual hospital volume through both dose-response and pairwise meta-analyses. A dose-response meta-analysis will be performed for studies reporting three or more categories of annual hospital volume. For pairwise meta-analysis, studies with two comparison groups will be analyzed directly, whereas studies with three or more comparison groups will be converted into binary comparisons. The certainty of evidence for each outcome will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and the Core GRADE approach. Ethics and disseminationAs this study will be based solely on previously published data, ethics approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO registration numberCRD420251121357
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Perioperative mortality in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: Protocol for a multi-level meta-regression analysis 95%
- Early high-sensitivity troponin elevation in predicting short-term mortality in sepsis: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis 94%
- Non-invasive Auricular Vagus nerve stimulation for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (NAVSaH): Protocol for a prospective, triple-blinded, randomized controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydrocortisone for the prevention of postoperative delirium in digestive surgery (HyPOD): Study protocol for a multicentre randomized, blind, placebo-controlled trial 93%
- The association between influenza vaccination, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality: a protocol for a living systematic review and prospective meta-analysis 92%
- Original Research; Quality Assessment And Comparative Analysis On The Recommendations Of Current Guidelines On Screening And Diagnosis Of Peripheral Arterial Disease; A Systematic Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of an Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation 91%
- Patient Risk-Benefit Preferences for Transcatheter versus Surgical Mitral Valve Repair 91%
- Long-term Outcomes of Peripheral Artery Disease In Veterans: Analysis of the PEripheral ARtery Disease Long-term Survival Study (PEARLS) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Antithrombotic Therapy in COVID-19: Systematic Summary of Ongoing or Completed Randomized Trials 91%
- Lipid-Modulating Agents for Prevention or Treatment of COVID-19 in Randomized Trials 89%
- Brain Injury after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.