Evaluating the impact of training tools on health workers during the introduction of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine: A mixed method study
Sultana, A.; Longchar, I.; Rio, G. R.; Ray, A.; Kumari, A.; Koshal, S. S.; Hora, R.; Kaur, A.; Mehra, R.; Ray, B.; Quadri, S. F.; Singh, S. K.; Roy, A. D.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV) was launched phase wise in India in 2017 and was expanded nationwide in 2021, during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic restrictions resulted in the hybrid trainings (physical and virtual) for the health workforce. A number of training tools were developed for the health workers to include pre-recorded sessions from immunization experts, presentations and ministry approved Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), along with the animated videos. As the hybrid model of training was deployed for the first time in the state of Nagaland, the present study aims to evaluate the impact of the training tools used for PCV introduction in Nagaland. MethodsMixed-method study was conducted in two districts from Nagaland selected using random sampling. In-depth interviews and Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were conducted with medical officers, Auxiliary Nurse Midwife (ANMs) and Accredited social Health activist (ASHAs), to gather their experience with the training tools. Quantitative data was collected through a survey among 36 ANMs and ASHAs to evaluate the impact of training tools. Based on Kirkpatricks model, qualitative data was thematically analysed using NVIVO 14 software, and quantitative data was analysed using SPSS software v.21. ResultFindings highlight that 29% of the respondents had received training through virtual sessions and 5% via hybrid mode. The majority (66%) of the trainings were in person. Most health workers, particularly the ANMs, found the training materials to be informative and comprehensible. Majority of the respondents preferred in-person training. The finding also revealed the challenges of online trainings included lack of focus, network instability, limited interactions with trainers and clarification of doubts real-time. Furthermore, the videos were highly appreciated for its precise content and comprehensiveness by the respondents (69%). Most of them (87%) found the videos as a pivotal tool for skill-based learning and community sensitization. ConclusionThe study revealed that the field workers still prefer face-to-face trainings. The benefits of online trainings were also highlighted. The training tools had significant positive impacts on health workers performance and its effectiveness on community and creating awareness among the communities. The study further makes key program-based recommendations to improve trainings in future. This included sessions with visual aids in the FAQs/leaflets, their availability in local dialects for explicitness and use of more interactive elements such as video-based tools for information dissemination.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Strengthening government’s response to COVID-19 in Indonesia: a modified Delphi study of medical and health academics 96%
- Community health worker knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19: learnings from an online cross-sectional survey using a digital health platform, UpSCALE, in Mozambique 96%
- COVID-19 self-testing in Nigeria: Stakeholders’ opinions and perspective on its value for case detection 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 97%
- Improving the last mile delivery of vaccines through an informed push model: experiences, opportunities and costs based on an implementation study in a rural district in Uganda 97%
- Assessments of Effectiveness of Technologies Utilizations in VIHSCM Among Selected Health Facilities in Tanzania Mainland 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Community-based Case Studies of Vaccine Hesitancy and the COVID-19 Response in South Africa; The VaxScenes Study 96%
- “Where the truth really lies”: Listening to voices from African American communities in the Southern States about COVID-19 vaccine information and communication 96%
- Comparison of Monkeypox disease knowledge and perception among the healthcare workers versus the general population during the first month of the WHO emerging infectious disease alert 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in the fourth country to authorize BNT162b2 during the first month of rollout 95%
- Impact of Electronic Immunization Registries and Electronic Logistics Management Information Systems in four Low-and Middle-Income Countries: Guinea, Honduras, Rwanda, and Tanzania 94%
- The effect of Health Literacy on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: The Moderating Role of Stress 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.