Development and Validation of the ICIS (Inclusive Capacity and Inclusion Intent Scale): A Psychometric Scale to Measure Individual Inclusion Intent and Inclusive Capacity
Gonzalez Ballesteros, L. M.; Castellanos Roncancio, C. A.; Mojica Ospina, L. E.
Show abstract
Violence and social exclusion are interconnected issues driven by factors such as inequality, poverty, and weak state institutions, leading to the marginalization of vulnerable groups. Being able to measure individuals ability to include others could be useful in guiding social intervention programs and improving resource allocation, especially in vulnerable populations. Using a mixed methods study we developed, pilot tested and evaluated a research-based scale to assess individuals inclusion intent as a proxy for inclusion capacity. The psychometric properties of this scale were also assessed. We found strong internal consistency for the entire scale ( = 0.89) and for two of the three domains (Attitudes = 0.84, Perceived Control = 0.83). Although the Subjective Norm domain showed lower reliability ( = 0.51), likely due to the limited number of items. These results provide preliminary evidence of construct validity whilst suggesting areas for enhancement, particularly regarding the measurement of the subjective norms related to inclusion. The new ICIS scale provides an innovative and reliable measure of inclusion intent, serving as an indicator of inclusion capacity. It is a useful tool for assessing individual inclusion abilities across various fields, including research, clinical practice, and policy development or implementation. Furthermore, it could be used to assess the general inclusion capacity of a community. Due to its recent introduction, direct comparisons with prior studies remain challenging. Further research is required to adjust any underperforming aspects of the scale and assess its validity in wider populations.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-Cultural Validation of Acculturation Measures: Expanding the East Asian Acculturation Framework for Global Applicability 96%
- Family Vulnerability Scale: evidence of content and internal structure validity 96%
- Analysis of University Students’ Mental Health from the Perspective of Occupational Harmony 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Kindness By Post’: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of A Participatory Public Mental Health Project 95%
- The measurement properties and acceptability of a new parent-infant bonding tool (‘Me and My Baby’) designed for use in a universal healthcare setting in the UK 94%
- Quality of life and depressive symptoms among Peruvian university students during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 95%
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 94%
- Conspiracy beliefs are associated with lower knowledge and higher anxiety levels regarding COVID-19 among students at the University of Jordan 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 94%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 93%
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.