Back

Measuring Joint Pain Through Tibio-Femoral Flexion: technique validation and assessment of behavior in response to different analgesics in rats

Malange, K. F.; Menezes de Souza, D.; Lemes, J. B. P.; Portugal, L. C.; Parada, C. A.

2025-08-18 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.13.669963 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAssessing knee joint pain in experimental OA (EOA) models remains a significant challenge. Our study demonstrates that the use of an adapted electronic von Frey (aVF) device, featuring a modified tip, surpasses the standard von Frey (sVF) in detecting knee joint pain behavior and evaluating the efficacy of analgesic treatments in OA model induced by monoiodine acetate (MIA). ResultsThe sVF was able to induce a behavior profile in naive animals characterized by a hind paw flinching and withdrawal reflex. This behavioral response was affected by intraplantar lidocaine, which prone to the increase in mechanical thresholds related to sVF and validate it as pain related behavior. On the aVF method, the animals displayed no alterations at their mechanical thresholds in presence or absence of lidocaine, suggesting minimal stimulation of hind paw by the modified methodology. In animals where an osteoarthritic phenotype was induced by MIA, the aVF was able to detect a significant reduction on joint mechanical thresholds. The behavior linked to aVF was significantly affected by systemic delivery of morphine, confirming a nociceptive-like phenotype and suggesting a pain behavior predominantly triggered by joint flexion. The aVF was also able to detect an analgesic profile in MIA-OA rats treated with dexamethasone, LPS-RS, fucoidan, and morphine, indicating effectiveness in measure different the response profile triggered by analgesic drugs that affect joint pain perception. ConclusionsOur results suggest aVF as a more appropriate method to evaluate joint pain in rats.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.