Back

Adapting Clinical Chemistry Plasma as a Source for Liquid Biopsies

Ding, S. C.; Yu, J.; Liao, T.; Ahmann, L.; Yao, Y.; Ho, C.; Wang, L.; Pinsky, B. A.; Gu, W.

2025-08-14 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.08.13.25333564 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDCirculating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become a valuable analyte for molecular testing, but requires specialized collection tubes or immediate processing. We investigated the feasibility of using residual plasma from heparin separators, which are routinely used in clinical chemistry, as an accessible and underutilized source for cfDNA biobanking and testing. METHODSWe analyzed matched plasma samples from healthy volunteers in two experiments: an immediate-processing tube comparison across EDTA, Streck, and heparin separators (n = 5) and a clinical-handling simulation that paired EDTA and heparin separator tubes and delayed processing at room temperature versus 4{degrees}C (n = 6). We also analyzed matched EDTA and heparin separator plasma samples from viral PCR-positive patients (Hospital Cohort; n =38). Whole-genome sequencing and genome-wide enriched methylation sequencing were performed to evaluate concordance across multiple benchmarks, including metagenomics, chromosomal copy number, methylome, and fragmentomics. RESULTSUnder immediate processing, heparin separator plasma showed high concordance with EDTA and Streck plasma for methylation patterns (Pearsons r = 0.92-0.93, Spearmans {rho}=0.65-0.70) and fragmentation features (n = 5). In the clinical-handling simulation, cfDNA integrity in heparin separators was comparable to that in EDTA at 4{degrees}C (n=6). In the Hospital Cohort, heparin separators showed a strong concordance with matched EDTA tubes for viral detection (n=38, Pearsons r=0.96), copy number alteration profiling (n=6, Pearsons r=0.96-1.00), and methylation patterns (n=12, r=0.83-0.93). CONCLUSIONHospital residual plasma from routine clinical chemistry tests that are processed within a short pre-centrifugation window and refrigerated can provide a vast, untapped resource for cfDNA biobanking and potential testing.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
4
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
5
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
7
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
9
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
27
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
29
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%