Back

Adapting Clinical Chemistry Plasma as a Source for Liquid Biopsies

Ding, S. C.; Yu, J.; Liao, T.; Ahmann, L.; Yao, Y.; Ho, C.; Wang, L.; Pinsky, B. A.; Gu, W.

2025-08-14 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.08.13.25333564 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDCirculating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become a valuable analyte for molecular testing, but requires specialized collection tubes or immediate processing. We investigated the feasibility of using residual plasma from heparin separators, which are routinely used in clinical chemistry, as an accessible and underutilized source for cfDNA biobanking and testing. METHODSWe analyzed matched plasma samples from healthy volunteers in two experiments: an immediate-processing tube comparison across EDTA, Streck, and heparin separators (n = 5) and a clinical-handling simulation that paired EDTA and heparin separator tubes and delayed processing at room temperature versus 4{degrees}C (n = 6). We also analyzed matched EDTA and heparin separator plasma samples from viral PCR-positive patients (Hospital Cohort; n =38). Whole-genome sequencing and genome-wide enriched methylation sequencing were performed to evaluate concordance across multiple benchmarks, including metagenomics, chromosomal copy number, methylome, and fragmentomics. RESULTSUnder immediate processing, heparin separator plasma showed high concordance with EDTA and Streck plasma for methylation patterns (Pearsons r = 0.92-0.93, Spearmans {rho}=0.65-0.70) and fragmentation features (n = 5). In the clinical-handling simulation, cfDNA integrity in heparin separators was comparable to that in EDTA at 4{degrees}C (n=6). In the Hospital Cohort, heparin separators showed a strong concordance with matched EDTA tubes for viral detection (n=38, Pearsons r=0.96), copy number alteration profiling (n=6, Pearsons r=0.96-1.00), and methylation patterns (n=12, r=0.83-0.93). CONCLUSIONHospital residual plasma from routine clinical chemistry tests that are processed within a short pre-centrifugation window and refrigerated can provide a vast, untapped resource for cfDNA biobanking and potential testing.

Published in eLife · training set

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.