Back

VO: The Vaccine Ontology

Zheng, J.; Lin, A. Y.; Huffman, A.; Masci, A. M.; Racz, R.; Wu, G.; Roan, K.; Ong, E.; Sarntivijai, S.; Hu, J.; Asfaw, E.; Kahn, H.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Kosar, N.; Li, J.; Manuel, W.; Abeysinghe, R.; Rehana, H.; Bansal, B.; Pan, Y.; Guo, J.; He, V.; Song, J.; Seleznev, A. I.; Hur, K.; He, A.; Davydov, A.; Yang, Q.; Vita, R.; Peters, B.; Ruttenberg, A.; Diehl, A. D.; Hoyt, C. T.; Roncaglia, P.; Huntley, R. P.; Scheuermann, R. H.; Courtot, M.; Todd, T.; Sayers, S.; Chen, F.; Li, X.; Yeh, F.-Y.; Xiang, Z.; Ozgur, A.; Whetzel, P. L.; Musen, M. A.; Mungall, C. J.; Leitner, W. W.; Cui, L.; Colby, L.

2025-08-15 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.08.12.669998 bioRxiv
Show abstract

With the widespread use of vaccines in research and clinical settings, there is an urgent need to standardize vaccine representation, integrate information across diverse vaccine types, and support computer-assisted reasoning. Accordingly, we have since 2007 developed the community-based Vaccine Ontology (VO), which aligns with the Basic Formal Ontology and adheres to OBO Foundry principles. VO models ontologically vaccines, vaccine components, vaccine immune responses, vaccine investigation studies and other vaccine-related topics. VO represents more than 10,000 vaccines targeting 289 infectious pathogens and cancers in humans and over 30 nonhuman animal species. VO provides mappings to external resources such as RxNorm, CVX, FDA, and USDA. Various VO use cases exist. VO facilitates vaccine standardization in resources such as the VIOLIN vaccine database, ImmPort, and the Vaccine Adjuvant Compendium (VAC). Semantic queries can be made to query VO. VO has been shown to enhance experimental and clinical vaccine data analysis and vaccine literature mining. Overall, VO standardizes vaccine modeling and representation and greatly supports vaccine AI research in the Semantic Web era.

Published in Scientific Data (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.