Back

A Reproducible Supermicrosurgical Model of Cervical Lymphatic-Venous Anastomosis in a Transgenic Alzheimer's Mouse: Technical Translation, Proficiency, and a Validated Learning Curve

Fang, R.; LEI, J.; Wu, J.; Xie, Q.; Xiao, M.; Kueckelhaus, M.; Yang, X.; Lu, H.

2025-08-15 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.08.11.657918 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCervical Lymphatic-Venous Anastomosis(LVA) holds therapeutic potential for Alzheimer disease (AD). However, a validated AD animal model for preclinical investigation remains lacking. This study aimed to establish and standardize LNVA, as a form of lymphatic-venous Anastomosis, in a murine AD model; to quantitatively assess its surgical learning curve; and to create a platform for mechanistic exploration and translational research. MethodsWe established and standardized a deep cervical lymph node-to-vein anastomosis (DC-LNVA), a specific type of lymphatic-venous anastomosis (LVA), in rodents. A two-stage training program was applied to a junior surgeon: 60 DC-LNVA procedures were performed in 30 small Sprague-Dawley rats (50-60g), followed by 20 bilateral anastomoses in 10 male 5XFAD mice. Surgical proficiency was evaluated using procedure time, UWOMSA scoring, and CUSUM analysis. Anatomical parameters were assessed with ImageJ. Anastomotic patency was confirmed via ICG lymphangiography. Intranasal Evans Blue was used to trace cranial distribution pathways. ResultsSD rats had significantly larger external jugular veins (0.376 {+/-} 0.013 mm vs. 0.228 {+/-} 0.011 mm) and DCLNs (1.359 {+/-} 0.084 mm2 vs. 0.333 {+/-} 0.022 mm2) than mice (P < 0.0001). Proficiency was achieved after 27 anastomoses in rats and 10 in mice. ICG confirmed 100% patency in 9 surviving 5XFAD mice. Evans Blue suggested a nasal-cranial pathway for tracer distribution. ConclusionWe developed and validated a cervical lymphatic-venous bypass (LVA) in transgenic AD mice. This platform complements existing loss-of-function approaches and offers a foundation for mechanistic and translational research into brain lymphatic clearance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Lab Animal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.1%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.1%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 20%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
7
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
9
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.6%
11
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
12
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Experimental Neurology
61 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
15
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Ophthalmology Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
20
Neurosurgery
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Neuroscience Bulletin
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
The Journal of Headache and Pain
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
26
Journal of Experimental Medicine
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
28
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%