Mapping the role of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and its receptors in chronic kidney disease- a scoping review protocol
Niroshika, H.; Weerakoon, H.; Herath, N.; Weerakoon, K.; Jayasooriya, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasingly recognized as a global public health concern, impacting about 700 million people worldwide. Due to the presence of both pro- and anti-apoptotic properties, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) can be a double-edged sword in the pathogenesis and progression of CKD. Systematic mapping of the available evidence is pivotal in identifying the exact role of TRAIL in CKD. Therefore, this protocol explains the methodological approach for a scoping review to map evidence regarding the role of TRAIL and its receptors in CKD. MethodsThe proposed scoping review will be conducted in line with Arksey and OMalleys methodological framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) reviewers manual. Accordingly, the review will be guided by the five-stage approach, namely (1) identify the research question; (2) identify relevant studies; (3) select studies; (4) chart the data; and (5) collate, summarize, and report the results. Eligibility criteria and search strategy will be formulated based on population, concept, and context (PCC) strategy. Articles published up to July 2025 will be searched using electronic databases, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library, while considering the Google Scholar reference lists of review articles as grey literature sources. A formal quality appraisal of the selected studies will be conducted using the mixed-method appraisal tool (MMAT version 2018). The reporting will be done following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for the Scoping Reviews checklist. The literature search is expected to commence after the protocol acceptance process, followed by study selection and data extraction by November 2025. Data synthesis will be completed by February 2026. Scoping review registrationThe review protocol is registered at Open Science Framework (OSF) under https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AENBX.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for renal stone development in adults with primary hyperparathyroidism: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- An individualized risk prediction model for new-onset, progression and regression of chronic kidney disease in a retrospective cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes under primary care in Hong Kong 94%
- Non-Invasive Magnetic resonance imaging Biomarkers to evaLuatE histology-proven kidney fibrosis in Chronic Kidney Disease (NIMBLE-CKD): an observational cohort study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ramadan and Kidney disease (RaK) risk assessment tool. Potential Risk Calculator for Evaluating the Risk of Ramadan Fasting In Chronic Kidney Disease patients 96%
- The Effect of Intradialytic Exercise on Dialysis Patient Survival: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Comparison of the prevalence and associated factors of chronic kidney disease diagnosed by serum creatinine or cystatin C among young people living with HIV in Uganda 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of statins on lipid profile of kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 93%
- Effects of rhein on bile acid homeostasis in rats 90%
- Identification of differential gene expression pattern in lens epithelial cells derived from cataractous and non-cataractous lenses of Shumiya cataract rat 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preprint server use in kidney disease research: a rapid review 93%
- The mediating role of trust in physicians on the association between multidimensional health literacy and medication adherence in hemodialysis: A cross-sectional study 92%
- Refining the Composition and Significance of Human Renal Intratubular Casts Using Spatial Protein Imaging 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.