Multimodal analysis identifies pericyte-centered signaling programs altered by sex and brain region in Alzheimer's Disease
El-Ghazawi, K.; Aberra, Y. T.; Veeramasu, Y.; Fares, W. A.; Isakson, B. E.; Sontheimer, H.; Eyo, U. B.; Peirce, S. M.
Show abstract
Pericytes are critical components of the neurovascular unit (NVU), regulating endothelial cell (EC) stability, blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity, and neuroimmune signaling. However, their role in Alzheimers Disease (AD), particularly in the context of sex differences and brain region specificity, remains poorly defined. Here, we use single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) to characterize transcriptional and intercellular signaling changes in pericytes across the middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) of the same AD and non-AD donors, stratified by sex. Using LIANA and Tensor-cell2cell, we identify latent communication programs altered in female AD donors, including a pericyte-EC signaling pattern that activates TGF{beta} via extracellular matrix ligands and is upregulated in the MTG but not the DLPFC. A second communication pattern, downregulated in female AD donors, reveals impaired estrogen pathway signaling through ligand-receptor interactions between pericytes and astrocytes. Supporting this, we observe reduced expression of pericyte-derived neuroligins and increased pericyte-astrocyte separation in a spatial transcriptomic subset. Additionally, we identify a microglia-to-pericyte signaling program conserved across brain regions, enriched for inflammatory pathways including hypoxia and p53, and elevated in both male and female AD donors with regional specificity. This result contrasts with the more sex-and region-specific pericyte signaling programs and suggests parallel mechanisms of NVU disruption between brain regions in AD. Our findings reveal brain region-specific and sex-specific pericyte signaling changes in AD and implicate vascular-, immune-, and synapse-associated pathways in NVU dysfunction. Altogether, the data suggest pericyte-driven communication as a mechanistic contributor to female-biased vulnerability in AD and support the need for sex-aware and region-specific approaches in neurodegeneration research.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A public resource of single cell transcriptomes and multiscale networks from persons with and without Alzheimer's disease 97%
- Deep clinical phenotyping of Alzheimer’s Disease Patients Leveraging Electronic Medical Records Data Identifies Sex-Specific Clinical Associations 96%
- Cell-type-specific Alzheimer’s disease polygenic risk scores are associated with distinct disease processes in Alzheimer’s disease 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative Network Analysis Reveals Novel Moderators of Aβ-Tau Interaction in Alzheimer's Disease 96%
- Perivascular space enlargement accelerates with hypertension, white matter hyperintensities, chronic inflammation, and Alzheimer’s disease pathology: evidence from a three-year longitudinal multicentre study 95%
- Selective agonism of GPR34 stimulates microglial uptake and clearance of amyloid β fibrils 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Regional interneuron transcriptional changes reveal pathologic markers of disease progression in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease 96%
- The Caribbean-Hispanic Alzheimer's Brain Transcriptome Reveals Ancestry-Specific Disease Mechanisms 95%
- Immune receptor LAG3 regulates microglia function duringAlzheimer's disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergence of distinct and heterogeneous strains of amyloid beta as Alzheimer s disease progresses in Down syndrome 96%
- Spatially resolved transcriptomics reveals unique gene signatures associated with human temporal cortical architecture and Alzheimer's pathology 96%
- Single-cell Spatial Proteomic Imaging for Human Neuropathology 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.