Back

Changes in thoracic Cobb angle dynamics following Nuss procedure and bar removal in adult patients with pectus excavatum

Htut, N.; Keong, D.-E.; Tzeng, I.-S.; Cheng, Y.-L.

2025-08-08 surgery
10.1101/2025.08.05.25333059 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPectus excavatum is associated with spinal abnormalities. The Nuss procedure is the standard surgical correction approach, though its effect on spinal alignment, especially the thoracic Cobb angle, remains unclear. This study examined changes in thoracic Cobb angle dynamics in 109 adult patients with pectus excavatum. MethodsPatients with pectus excavatum (109; 86 males and 23 females; mean age: 23.9 {+/-} 5.29 years) who underwent the Nuss procedure and subsequent bar removal were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including serial thoracic Cobb angle measurements from posteroanterior chest radiographs preoperatively, 1 month, 3-6 months, and 1 year postoperatively, 1 day pre-bar removal, and 1 week post-bar removal. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sex, Haller index ([&ge;] or <4), bar number (1, 2, or 3) and position (oblique vs. horizontal), bar flipping within 3 months, and preoperative Cobb angle (< or [&ge;]10{degrees}). ResultsMean thoracic Cobb angle significantly increased 1 month postoperatively (preoperative: 5.35{+/-}4.80{degrees} vs. 1 month postoperative: 5.75{+/-}5.00{degrees}, P=0.004), but significantly decreased 1 day before bar removal (preoperative: 5.35{+/-}4.80{degrees} vs. 1 day pre-bar removal: 4.90{+/-}4.74{degrees}, P=0.006) and 1 week after (preoperative: 5.35{+/-}4.80{degrees} vs. 1 week post-bar removal: 4.26{+/-}4.72{degrees}, P<0.001). Cobb angle significantly improved after bar removal. ConclusionsIn adult patients with pectus excavatum, the Nuss procedure induced a transient increase in thoracic Cobb angle 1 month postoperatively, followed by a significant reduction after bar removal. Early bar flipping correlated with diminished Cobb angle correction.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.