Back

Regorafenib in Bone Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Its Effectiveness and Safety in Cancer Treatment

Rahmanian, M.; Khosropanah, S.; Hoseinzadeh Moghaddam, S.; Vatankhah, A.; Abdi Bastami, E.; Roashanzamir, S.; Rahmanian Sharifabad, A.; Ganji, R.

2025-08-06 oncology
10.1101/2025.08.04.25332569 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesBone sarcomas are aggressive malignancies with limited treatment options in advanced stages. Regorafenib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor, has showed potential efficacy in early-phase trials. However, its overall effectiveness and safety profile in bone sarcoma remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the clinical impact of regorafenib on survival outcomes and adverse events in patients with bone sarcomas. MethodsA systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between September 27, 2012, and April 2024. Eligible studies included full-text RCTs comparing regorafenib to placebo in the treatment of bone sarcomas. Meta-analyses, reviews, case reports, conference abstracts, ongoing trials, and animal studies were excluded from the analysis. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Data synthesis was performed using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed via the I{superscript 2} statistic. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) was applied to evaluate study quality. Statistical analysis was conducted using R version 4.3.1. ResultsA total of five RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Regorafenib significantly improved PFS compared to placebo (MD = 9.69 weeks; 95% CI: 4.54, 14.84; I{superscript 2} = 0%), while no statistically significant improvement was observed in OS (MD = 0.85 weeks; 95% CI:-36.33, 38.02; I{superscript 2} = 0%). Predominantly observed treatment-emergent effects linked to regorafenib included hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, asthenia or fatigue, and diarrhea. ConclusionRegorafenib significantly improves progression-free survival in bone sarcoma but does not show a clear benefit in overall survival. While adverse events are common, they are generally manageable. Further research is needed to optimize dosing, patient selection, and to determine the long-term survival benefits.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.1%
4
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
7
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
9
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
11
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
16
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%