The Impact of Natural Sunlight on Quality of Life and Psychological Well-Being
Wessolowski, N.; Rodenkirchen, M.; Mählmann, S.
Show abstract
Sunlight is widely assumed to enhance well-being. However, systematic reviews suggest that the evidence is less extensive and partly inconsistent than commonly assumed. In this study, n = 120 predominantly young adults completed an online survey assessing quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) and well-being (FAHW). Participants additionally reported how much time they had spent outdoors and at which locations during the preceding 14 days. These self-reports were matched with local and temporal data from the German Weather Service to estimate each participants individual sunshine duration. Correlation analyses revealed significant but small associations between sunshine duration and well-being, as well as between sunshine duration and three of the four quality-of-life domains. The findings support the assumed relationship between sunshine duration, quality of life, and well-being, while also demonstrating a novel approach to determine individual sunshine duration. Future studies should validate this method with larger and more diverse samples. Although increased sun exposure is associated with a higher risk of skin cancer, this aspect was beyond the scope of the present study. The proposed approach may also be applied to studies on artificial light exposure to control for participants natural daylight exposure (light history).
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Abrupt light transitions in illuminance and CCT result in different temporal dynamics and interindividual variability for sensation, comfort and alertness 95%
- A colorimetric comparison of sunless with natural skin tan 93%
- Socioecological benefits of academic greenspace for human health, plant, and pollinator diversity: a mixed-method study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and causes of vision impairment in Norwest Portugal: a capture and recapture study 91%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 91%
- Examining the associations between the food environment and dietary intake in British Columbia: A cross-sectional study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of Human-Centric Lighting on Performance in the Attentional Network Test (ANT) and on Perceived Stress 94%
- Effect of Odor Stimulations on Physical Activity: A Systematic Review 93%
- Augmented-reality-based multi-person exercise has more beneficial effects on mood state and oxytocin secretion than standard solitary exercise 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ambulatory physiological measures obtained under naturalistic urban mobility conditions have acceptable reliability 92%
- Light of both high and low melanopic illuminance improves alertness and attention during daytime 91%
- Morningness-eveningness assessment from mobile phone communication analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuroscientific Insights into the Built Environment: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research on Indoor Environmental Quality, Physiological Dynamics, and Psychological Well-Being in Real-Life Contexts 93%
- “Climate change and health?”: Knowledge and perceptions among key stakeholders in Puducherry, India 92%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.