The Bidirectional Relationship Between Coronary Artery Disease and Epilepsy: Cross-sectional and Prospective Cohort Studies from the UK Biobank
Zhang, L.; Liu, W.; Xue, Y.; Wang, L.; Gong, C.; She, Z.-G.; Li, H.
Show abstract
Background and aimsCoronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, while epilepsy is a common neurological disorder. Previous studies have compared the cardiovascular comorbidity burden in patients with epilepsy and their risk of cardiovascular mortality during follow-up. However, the bidirectional relationship between CAD and epilepsy remains unexplored. This study comprehensively assessed the association between CAD and epilepsy using cross-sectional and cohort designs in the UK Biobank, and further investigated whether genetic susceptibility influences this link. MethodsThis population-based study utilized UK Biobank data to investigate the relationship between epilepsy and CAD. A cross-sectional analysis of 502,359 participants was conducted using logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs). In cohort 1 (n = 496,921 without baseline epilepsy), stratified Cox models assessed the risk of incident epilepsy by CAD status. In cohort 2 (n = 475,130 without baseline CAD), the risk of incident CAD by epilepsy status was similarly evaluated. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for both CAD and epilepsy were constructed to explore genetic susceptibility. ResultsThe median age at baseline was 58.0 years, and 45.60% were male. During a median follow-up of 13.82 years for epilepsy and 13.73 years for CAD, 3,590 participants developed epilepsy and 39,223 developed CAD. In cross-sectional analysis, CAD was significantly associated with epilepsy. In Cohort 1, CAD was associated with higher epilepsy risk (HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.15-1.45; P < 0.001), and in Cohort 2, epilepsy was associated with higher CAD risk (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.18-1.52; P < 0.001). These associations persisted across subgroups by age, sex, and BMI. Interestingly, CAD was linked to incident epilepsy only in participants with low genetic risk, while epilepsy predicted CAD only in those with high genetic susceptibility. ConclusionsOur findings indicate a bidirectional association between CAD and epilepsy, while also exploring the heterogeneity of this association across different subpopulations and its potential modification by genetic susceptibility. These results underscore the need for further studies to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and clinical implications of this association.
Matching journals
The top 17 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Chromosome 10q24.32 Variants Associate with Brain Arterial Diameters in Diverse Populations: A Genome-Wide Association Study 89%
- Trajectories of Cognitive Decline Before and After New-onset Hypertension 89%
- Olfactory impairment and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in older adults 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genotype-phenotype correlations in SCN8A -related disorders reveal prognostic and therapeutic implications 92%
- Predictive models for starting antiseizure medication withdrawal following epilepsy surgery in adults 92%
- The genomic landscape across 474 surgically accessible epileptogenic human brain lesions 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Daily intermittent fasting is an effective multiscale treatment in preclinical models of absence epilepsy 92%
- Neuronal Hyperexcitability: A Key to Unravelling Hippocampal Synaptic Dysfunctions in Lafora Disease 91%
- Penetrance of pathogenic epilepsy variants is low and shaped by common genetic background 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative Analysis of Epilepsy-Associated Genes Reveals Expression-Phenotype Correlations 92%
- Effects of chronic cannabidiol in a mouse model of naturally occurring neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and spontaneous seizures 90%
- CUX2 deficiency causes facilitation of excitatory synaptic transmission onto hippocampus and increased seizure susceptibility to kainate 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.