Back

Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative CT Staging for Esophageal Cancer for Surgical Patients at Public Hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Tadesse, H. D.; Mesfin, A. A.; Negussie, M. A.; Demessa, M. D.; Teferi, M. G.; Tesfaye, S. Z.

2025-08-03 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.08.01.25332671 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEsophageal cancer is a major health concern in Ethiopia and is often diagnosed at advanced stages because of limited access to diagnostic tools. Computed tomography is the primary imaging modality used for preoperative staging at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital and its affiliated centers. However, its diagnostic accuracy has not been well studied locally. ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative CT TNM staging of esophageal cancer in surgical patients, postoperative histopathological findings were used as the gold standard. MethodThis retrospective cross-sectional study included 121 patients with histologically confirmed esophageal cancer who underwent preoperative CT staging and surgery between January 2021 and December 2024 at TASH and affiliated hospitals. Data were collected from medical records and CT images and analyzed via SPSS version 27. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. ResultsAmong the patients, 57.02% were female and 42.98% male, with a median age of 54 years. SCC was the predominant histologic type (84.3%). Preoperative CT staging revealed T3 in 67.8% and T4 in 32.2% of patients. Nodal staging revealed N0 in 77.7% of the patients. The diagnostic accuracies of CT for the T3 and T4 stages were 49.6% and 67.8%, respectively. For the N0 to N3 stages, the accuracy ranged from 61.9% to 95%. The combined sensitivity and specificity for T staging were 82.6% and 20%, respectively; for N staging, they were 88.1% and 25.4%, respectively. ConclusionCT imaging has moderate accuracy in staging esophageal cancer but has limitations, particularly in differentiating tumor depth and nodal involvement. These findings underscore the need for multimodal imaging approaches, including MRI, PET, and EUS, where available, to improve preoperative assessment and patient outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
29.2%
2
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
5
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
6
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
7
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
8
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
14
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
15
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
23
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%