Back

Title-Impact of combined medication payment management policies on population health performance

Duan, D.; yang, y.

2025-08-02 health policy
10.1101/2025.08.01.25332645
Show abstract

This study investigated the mechanism and impact of a policy combination involving centralized drug procurement and national drug price negotiations on health insurance payment management and overall health performance of the population. Relying on a two-dimensional analytical framework of health outcomes and medical expenditures, the entropy value method was applied to construct indicators of residents health portfolios. The year 2019, marked by the large-scale implementation of centralized procurement and national medicine catalog negotiations, was identified as the policy breakpoint for constructing a breakpoint regression model. Based on CFPS data, the model was implemented to evaluate changes in residents health performance and medical expenditure efficiency. Furthermore, the mechanisms underlying policy effects were examined from the perspectives of drug expenditure, pharmaceutical innovation (e.g., R&D inputs and patent output), and drug trade including imports and exports. The results indicated that this policy combination significantly improved population health outcomes and enhanced the efficiency of healthcare spending. The mechanism analysis further confirmed its short-term effects on stimulating innovation, increasing drug accessibility, and promoting expenditure efficiency. In addition, empirical evidence supported the hypothesized synergy between import substitution and export upgrading. Therefore, it is recommended to establish a value-oriented drug classification and payment management mechanism while adapting regional policies to provide a scientific basis for optimizing pharmaceutical policy design and balancing health accessibility with the advancement of innovation in the pharmaceutical industry.Keywords: Volume Procurement; national drug negotiation; health performance; breakpoint regression

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 13%
22.5%
2
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 1.0%
11.4%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 1%
8.5%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 30%
6.0%
5
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 27%
3.2%
7
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 9%
2.7%
8
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 6%
2.5%
10
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 12%
2.5%
11
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
1.8%
12
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
13
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 5%
1.5%
14
JMIR Medical Informatics
based on 16 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
15
BMC Medical Education
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Vaccines
based on 131 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 6%
0.9%
18
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
19
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 16%
0.9%
20
Public Health
based on 34 papers
Top 5%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 15%
0.9%
22
JMIRx Med
based on 29 papers
Top 4%
0.9%
23
F1000Research
based on 28 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
24
BMC Health Services Research
based on 43 papers
Top 5%
0.8%