Proposed standards for prosthetic foot reuse and considerations for donation of used prosthetic feet to low-and middle-income countries
Berthaume, M. A.; Ackers, L.; Kenney, L.; Nagaraja, V. H.; Maduako, P.
Show abstract
Prosthetic limb provision in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) is complex. Prosthetics from high-income countries (HICs) are often replaced not because they are broken, but because of warranties and/or guidelines, meaning they may still be usable. However, as there are no standards/regulatory requirements guaranteeing the quality or safety of second-hand devices, they are often disposed of or donated to LMICs. Without standards to guarantee the quality of donated prosthetics could lead to a violation of the World Health Organizations principles of good donation. Here, we compare 196 feet delivered prior to the introduction of an internal check for prosthetic foot quality introduced by a UK-based charity (STAND) with 170 feet delivered afterwards. The implementation of the check increased the percentage of usable second-hand prosthetic feet received by donation recipients from 83.16% to 94.12%. Foot brand significantly affected usability, but further data and larger samples are needed to disentangle the effects of prosthetic brand, prosthetic foot model, and donation centre on prosthetic foot usability. We propose a rapid and efficient quality checklist as a set of standards governing used prosthetic foot reuse and donation and discuss future directions for this line of work. The creation of an international set of standards/regulatory requirements governing the use of prosthetic limbs, like the international standards used for prosthetic limb design, would not only enable the safe, useful provision of prosthetics in LMICs, but would also set the groundwork for understanding how a repair, reuse, and recycle model for prosthetics might be implemented in HICs. Globally, this could decrease prosthetic provision time, create a circular economy for prosthetics, and reduce the carbon footprint of prosthetic manufacture and provision.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of the ECLIPSE model of meaningful outcome domains following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation, through systematic review and best fit framework synthesis 95%
- Open-source 3D Printable Forearm Crutch 95%
- What do blind people "see" with retinal prostheses? Observations and qualitative reports of epiretinal implant users 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Purchasing high-cost medical equipment in hospitals: A systematic review 93%
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing core osteoarthritis treatments in China: a mixed-method study 92%
- Protocol for a scoping review of the impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation Of A New “All In One” Sars-Cov-2 Antigen-Detecting Rapid Diagnostic Test And Self-Test: Diagnostic Performance And Usability On Child And Adult Population 89%
- The modified COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRSm) patient-reported outcome measure for Long Covid or Post-COVID syndrome 88%
- Evaluation of seven different rapid methods for nucleic acid detection of SARS-COV-2 virus 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Plantar Surface Shear Strain Methodology Utilising Digital Image Correlation 93%
- An Investigation into Patient-Specific 3D Printed Titanium Stents and the use of Etching to Overcome Selective Laser Melting Design Constraints. 91%
- Nonthermal plasma treatment of polymers modulates biological fouling but can cause material embrittlement 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.