Availability and Affordability of Essential Medicines from the WHO Global Core List in Albania: A Cross-Sectional Survey Using the WHO/HAI Methodology
Petro, E.; Siebers, A. C. M.; Mantel-Teeuwisse, A. K.; Suleman, F.; van den Ham, H. A.
Show abstract
There is limited information on the current state of access to essential medicines in Albania. Therefore, this study investigated the accessibility of essential medicines using an adapted version of the World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) methodology. A cross-sectional survey of 30 private pharmacies was undertaken, across six urban areas, and for 14 medicines from the Global Core List (GCL). Data on availability, patient prices, and affordability were collected, with affordability measured using the daily wage of the lowest-paid government worker (LPGW) and the median price ratio (MPR). MPRs were calculated to compare local prices with international reference and regional benchmarks. The mean availability of the GCL medicines was 79.8%, falling short of the WHOs 80% benchmark, though it improved to 83.3% when availability of alternative formulations were included. Ceftriaxone, amoxicillin, and salbutamol were among the least available medicines and were frequently reported as out of stock. All medicines, except ceftriaxone, met the LPGW affordability criteria. MPR analysis showed that while most medicines were priced competitively, some, like diclofenac and ceftriaxone, were significantly more expensive than international reference prices. Price comparisons indicated that Albanian medicine prices were generally lower than those in selected Balkan and EU countries, although MPRs for five medicines were 4 times higher compared to international reference prices. Overall, 64% of the surveyed medicines met both availability and affordability thresholds. It was found that access to medicines in Albania is primarily limited by availability rather than affordability. The study highlights significant gaps in the availability of key antibiotics and asthma medications, emphasizing the need for policy reforms to improve rational use and other pharmaceutical value chain interventions. These results are important for shaping Albanias health policy in advancing towards equal access to essential medicines
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Access to essential medicines for noncommunicable diseases during conflicts: the case cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and epilepsy in Northern Syria 97%
- Drug Supply Management at First-level Public Health Facilities: Case of Pyay District, Myanmar 94%
- Availability of Essential Medicines During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study Examining Experiences and Level of Preparedness in Kenya 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extent and causes of the collapse in the registration of innovative medications in Lebanon: A mixed-methods analysis 95%
- Adverse drug reactions associated with the use of biological agents 94%
- Assessment of knowledge and perception of prescribers towards rational medicine use in the Ashanti Region of Ghana 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A study of the quality of cardiovascular and diabetes medicines in Malang District, Indonesia, using exposure-based sampling 97%
- Legal residency status and its relationship with health indicators among Syrian refugees in Lebanon: a nested cross-sectional study 90%
- Implementing long-acting injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis services at private pharmacies in Kenya: Client, pharmacy provider, and key stakeholder perspectives on potential challenges and opportunities 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in price of cardiovascular and diabetes medicine in Indonesia, and relationship with quality: a mixed methods study in East Java 96%
- A survey assessing antimicrobial prescribing at UNRWA primary health care centers in Jordan 93%
- Healthcare professionals and students awareness of Chagas disease: design and validation of ChaLKS (Chagas Level of Knowledge Scale) 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.