U.S. Visa Bureaucracy and Its Burdens Among Early Career Scholars
Nofal, M.; Espada, R. F.-; Ganguly, P.; Chugh, M.
Show abstract
Foreign-born research scholars on temporary visas are essential to the U.S. scientific workforce and economy, yet they face systemic challenges shaped by restrictive immigration policies. While scholars across disciplines have long analyzed the evolution of U.S. immigration regimes and citizenship privilege, there remains a critical lack of quantitative data on the financial, temporal, and psychological burdens associated with visa bureaucracy. Here we present original survey data from more than 700 international postdoctoral researchers at Harvard Medical School (HMS) and its affiliated institutions, revealing how visa-related burdens directly impact scholars and their research. For example, over 40% of scholars reported spending more than a month in their home countries to renew U.S. visas, with 5% spending more than six months. Scholars from Asia experienced longer delays and higher costs than those from Europe. Seventy-five percent of respondents reported mental health challenges related to visa stress, often feeling trapped at work, with some requiring medication and time off. Our findings underscore the urgent need for targeted institutional support to promote research productivity, equitable opportunity, and mental well-being. As the U.S. repositions itself as a global scientific leader, such reforms will be critical to recruiting and retaining top talent and advancing equity in science.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of COVID-19 on the Postdoctoral Experience: a comparison of pre-pandemic and pandemic surveys. 97%
- Analysis of NIH K99/R00 Awards and the Career Progression of Awardees 95%
- Development and Assessment of a Sustainable PhD Internship Program Supporting Diverse Biomedical Career Outcomes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Black women in medical education publishing: Bibliometric and testimonio accounts using intersectionality methodology 93%
- An Evaluation of the Vulnerable Physician Workforce in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic 90%
- Association of patients’ past misdiagnosis experiences with trust in their current physician: the TRUMP 2 -Net study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Citizenship status and career self-efficacy: An intersectional study of biomedical trainees in the United States 92%
- Advancing science or advancing careers? Researchers' opinions on success indicators 92%
- Junior scientists spotlight social bonds in seminars for diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.