Pharmacological weight loss with incretin-based therapies does not result in a disproportionate loss of muscle mass or function in obese mice and humans.
Langer, H. T.; Gilmore, N. K.; Hayden, C. M. T.; Roux, J.; Bariohay, B.; Rhouquet, T.; Awada, M.; Marcotorchino, J.; Bournot, L.; Nunn, E.; Titchenell, P. M.; Liskiewicz, D.; Mueller, T. D.; Anyiam, O.; Atherton, P. J.; Idris, I.; Haritonow, N.; Norman, K.; Mueller-Werdan, U.; Baar, K.
Show abstract
The new generation of incretin-based therapies are potent anti-obesity medications (AOMs) that offer the first non-surgical treatment for 936 million patients globally suffering from being overweight or obese[1]. However, clinical data suggest that incretin-mimetics could cause a disproportionate decrease in lean body mass (LBM) [2, 3], raising a concern for deterioration of skeletal muscle and acceleration of sarcopenic obesity[4]. Unfortunately, muscle mass and function are not routinely assessed in obesity studies and original data on the matter remains sparse. In this work, we conducted various pre-clinical studies and a proof-of-concept clinical trial to examine how skeletal muscle is affected by AOMs. We found that in mice with diet-induced obesity (DIO), incretin-based therapies result predominantly in a substantial decrease in fat mass alongside a small but significant decrease in LBM. Among the lean tissues, the decrease in liver mass exceeded the change in muscle mass robustly. While absolute muscle mass did decrease, relative muscle mass (i.e., the muscle mass to body weight (BW) ratio) improved significantly. Similarly, we found that absolute muscle strength decreased mildly but increased relative to the BW of mice. The relative preservation of muscle was also associated with marked improvement in running performance. Additionally, during a scenario of extreme muscle wasting (i.e., immobilization), DIO mice on incretin-based therapies did not experience more muscle loss than calorie-matched, pair-fed mice. Finally, in our clinical proof-of-concept trial, patients on AOMs significantly decreased BW, which was accompanied by a mild decrease in absolute LBM but an improvement in relative LBM. Muscle function as indicated by maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) did not decrease. Overall, these data suggest that in middle-aged obese mice and men, incretin-based therapies do cause a mild decrease in absolute muscle mass and strength that is offset by a more pronounced decrease in fat and liver mass, resulting in an improved muscle to BW ratio, function, and mobility.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adipocyte-specific ablation of the Ca2+ pump SERCA2 impairs whole-body metabolic function and reveals the diverse metabolic flexibility of white and brown adipose tissue. 94%
- Mouse models for V103I and I251L gain of function variants of the human MC4R display reduced adiposity and are not protected from a hypercaloric diet 94%
- Mechanisms underlying the efficacy of a rodent model of vertical sleeve gastrectomy - a focus on energy expenditure 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Semaglutide-induced weight loss improves mitochondrial energy efficiency in skeletal muscle 94%
- Exposure to early life stress impairs weight loss maintenance success in mice. 94%
- Mice lacking dopamine production in neurotensin receptor 1 neurons voluntarily undergo time-restricted feeding of high fat diet and resist obesity 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake partly relies on p21-activated kinase (PAK)-2, but not PAK1, in mouse skeletal muscle 95%
- Contrasting recruitment of skin-associated adipose depots during cold challenge of mouse and human 92%
- Nicotinamide Riboside supplementation does not alter whole-body or skeletal muscle metabolic responses to a single bout of endurance exercise 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.