Back

Job Satisfaction and Its Determinants Among Occupational Safety Experts Working in Turkiye's Joint Health and Safety Units

Kaya, E.; Yardim, M. S.

2025-07-28 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2025.07.28.25331855 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThis study aims to examine the job satisfaction of occupational safety experts working in Joint Health and Safety Units (JHSUs) in Turkiye, and to identify the associated factors, including perceived competence, workload, support, and training. MethodsA cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in September 2024 using an online questionnaire. A total of 102 occupational safety experts participated. The survey included sociodemographic questions, the Job Satisfaction Questionnaire, and the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale. Chi-square, post-hoc power, and regression analyses were used to explore associations between variables and job satisfaction. ResultsThe findings indicated that mental wellbeing, perceived competence, managerial support, and the ability to fulfill job requirements were significantly associated with higher job satisfaction. Perceived adequacy of training and concerns about job security also played a role. Despite expectations, increasing years of experience and certification class did not correspond with increased job satisfaction, suggesting that experience alone may not enhance perceived competence. The overall sample was skewed toward more experienced and highly engaged professionals, with underrepresentation of C class certified experts. ConclusionThe study provides insights into factors influencing job satisfaction among occupational safety experts and highlights the role of psychological and organizational dynamics beyond demographic characteristics. The findings underline the need for targeted strategies to improve training quality, support mechanisms, and working conditions. Furthermore, such research contributes to a broader understanding of how differing national OHS practices impact the job satisfaction and competencies of safety professionals.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.7%
2
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
Journal of Occupational Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
5
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
9
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
16
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%