Back

A PAM-CNN recognition approach to Muscle Fatigue of Special Operators by sEMG signals

Xu, B.; Lin, M.; Yue, Z.; Ji, S.; Ouyang, W.; Li, C.

2025-07-23 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.07.20.665786 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fatigue operation was the primary accident causes of large special equipment which could lead to serious economic loss and personnel injury or death, so the establishment of early fatigue warning methods was of great significance to reduce the accident rate. In view of the working environment and biomechanics properties of operators of special equipment, theoretical and experimental method was presented to analyze the fatigue mechanism and accumulate data samples, and then a new approach was proposed to recognize muscle fatigue by classifying these datasets. Firstly, in order to deduce fatigue mechanism, hidden Markov chain was adopted to build five-element theoretical model for studying interaction between machines and operators muscles during operation process, so that influence factors and tested points of muscles were approached; Surface electromyographic (sEMG) sensors were introduced to acquire muscle signals which were taken as sample data, and wavelet packet was adopted to extract features of these data. Subsequently, a convolutional neural network (CNN) classification model based on partial attention mechanism (PAM) was proposed to execute triple fatigue classification, moreover cross entropy-Adam algorithm was applied to train and optimize this model. Finally, large crane operators were taken as case studies to verify the proposed model. By comparison results indicated when the number of extracted features was 3 and the size of patch was [5,5], PAM-CNN model could approach the optimum solution of fatigue recognition, and the average accuracy could achieve 95.6% in test datasets, which showed a good potential in practical application.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.