Need for a definitive trial of local versus general anaesthesia in chronic subdural haematoma; lessons from a systematic review, survey, and scoping review of other surgical conditions

BackgroundChronic subdural haematoma (cSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition, many patients have significant comorbidity or are living with frailty. Surgery is effective and can be performed under local anaesthesia (with or without sedation) or general anaesthesia. Optimal technique for both GA and LA is poorly defined but similar questions have been explored in other surgical settings. We sought to clarify the breadth of evidence for anaesthetic technique in cSDH surgery, while drawing on relevant literature from other disciplines to understand how a definitive trial of this question could be performed. Materials and MethodsWe used a combination of systematic and narrative literature search, review of trial registries, the Cochrane database, and a survey of anaesthetic and neurosurgical practitioners. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of trial and observational studies in this area was performed following PROSPERO registration. ResultsWe identified a paucity of high-quality studies, especially randomised trials, exploring this question. The literature, and a survey of anaesthetists and surgeons, suggest that local anaesthesia may bring benefits in shorter hospital stay and reduced complications. Registered studies in this field are single centre in nature while a synthesis of Cochrane reviews in other fields echoes issues of equipoise, study design, and outcome choice as key challenges in designing a definitive trial. ConclusionsThere is significant interest in this topic as evidenced by published and emerging literature and views of anaesthetists and surgeons. No registered trial is multi-centre or draws on challenges identified in similar trials from other disciplines. Our paper helps create a roadmap to a definitive trial of this crucial question.