Back

Tailoring a glycerol-free cryopreservation protocol with anti-freeze (glycol)proteins for commercial and native breeds of chicken

BERNAL JUAREZ, B.; Varadi, E.; Drobnyaak, A.; Hogervorst, T.; Liptoi, K.; Voets, I.; de Wit, A.; Santiago-Moreno, J.; Hawken, R.; de Kovel, C.; Hiemstra, S.-J.; Woelders, H.; Vegi, B.

2025-07-19 cell biology
10.1101/2025.07.18.664799 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study evaluated the effects of antifreeze proteins AFPI, AFPIII, and AFGP during fresh processing, and freezing-thawing of chicken semen from a commercial broiler breed (BB) and the local breed Yellow Hungarian (YH), using 0.6 mol/L DMA as cryoprotectant. AFPI had small but significant (p<0.05) positive effects on post-thaw sperm viability and motility in BB. For YH semen, three freezing protocols with different dilution rates (4x, 2.3x, 2.1x) were compared. Protocol 1 (dilution rate 4x) gave the best post-thaw viability (P<0.001) and was used further. Fertility rates (FR) of pre-freezing steps were tested by inseminating WL hens (4 AI/hen in 2 weeks, 100 x 10L sp/dose). FRs for A) raw semen, B) chilled semen, C) B + DMA, D) B + AFPI, and E) B + DMA + AFPI were 48.2, 3.7, 31.4, 21.4, and 16.1%, respectively. B was lower than A (p<0.001), while C-E were higher than B (p<0.005). AFPI during freezing gave no advantage compared with DMA, except for improved post-thaw DNA integrity. Inseminations with frozen-thawed semen (8 AI/hen in 3 weeks, 100 x 10L sp/dose) gave low FR with YH semen, regardless of hen type. FR with YH semen was 0% without AFPI and 1.5% with AFPI. The oviduct embryo mortality (18.0%{+/-}1.4) observed across all the different hen groups suggested insufficient number of spermatozoa inseminated. In conclusion, AFPI improved some post-thaw traits, but fertility outcomes remain inconclusive. Preventing pre-freezing fertility loss and increasing sperm dose concentration are required.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.