Back

Impact of Sugar-Based Baits on Midgut Microbiome Composition in Aedes Mosquitoes: Implications for Vector Control

Sambanthan, R.; ABU KASSIM, N. F.; Abuelmaali, S. A.; Kamil, W. M. W. A.; Sabar, S.; Zarkasi, K. Z.; Ishak, W. R. W.; Webb, C. E.

2025-07-18 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.07.17.665286 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many severe mosquito-borne diseases are transmitted by the Aedes sp. mosquitoes. Control efforts have been strengthened by the implementation of novel integrated vector management techniques such as alginate hydrogel beads and appealing toxic sugar bait. These techniques help to control mosquitoes by taking advantage of their attraction to sugar. Different types of sugar that mosquitoes ingest during feeding can affect the makeup of microbiome in the midgut. Immune priming and baseline immune activity are maintained by mosquito midgut microbiome. Thus, this study is currently focusing on using microbial communities for vector control measures with a particular emphasis on how they consume various forms of sugar. Both wild and lab strain Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus mosquito samples were reared and fed with attractive targeted sugar baits (ATSBs) infused with Chrysanthemum, mango, mix and control solutions. Then, the impact on bacterial communities was assessed by using 16S rRNA gene sequences. According to our findings, the majority of the bacterial species in mango and mix treatments belonged to the Enterobacteriaceae family. A total of 24 various bacterial species were found in Aedes mosquitoes that fed on mango ATSBs. All isolates were members of three phyla from Actinobacteria (4.16%), Firmicutes (54.17%), and Proteobacteria (41.67%). Data reveals that different species, strains and diet affect the midgut bacterial diversity in the mosquitoes. In addition to improving our knowledge concerning the way this bacterium shapes the microbial community, a thorough investigation of the prevalence of the midgut bacterial community is essential for alerting present and future mosquito and disease control initiatives.

Published in PLOS ONE (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

PLOS ONE · published here
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.2%
2
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
3
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.3%
5
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
6
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
7
Microbial Ecology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.3%
9
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
10
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
12
Pathogens
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
13
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
Malaria Journal
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Journal of Microbiological Methods
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Pest Management Science
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
22
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
23
Animal Microbiome
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Virology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
27
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%