A Self-Administered Digital Test Battery for Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Alzheimer's Disease
Rutt, S.; Taute, M.; Tegethoff, P.; Perneczky, R.; Kurz, C.; Rauchmann, B.-S.
Show abstract
IntroductionEarly detection of cognitive decline is crucial for timely intervention in Alzheimers disease (AD). Traditional paper-pencil assessments often face limitations in accessibility, lengthy administration, and interrater reliability, restricting their broader application across diverse populations. Digital tools may overcome these restrictions by offering user-friendly, non-verbal, and scalable assessments. This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of BraincheX, a newly developed digital test battery designed with a focus on accessibility and usability, by comparing its subtest performance to equivalents of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for AD (CERAD)-Plus battery. MethodsFifty-six participants with early AD and healthy controls were recruited from the LMU hospital memory clinic. Diagnostic groups were defined by amyloid positivity and clinical expert consensus. Participants completed both the BraincheX digital battery and the CERAD-Plus assessment. A total BraincheX score was calculated by summing standardized subtest scores. Data were analyzed using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and the Youden Index to determine diagnostic accuracy. Correlations between BraincheX and CERAD-Plus subtests were examined, and group differences were analyzed via ANOVA. ResultsROC analysis revealed strong diagnostic accuracy for the BraincheX total score in differentiating between early AD and controls (AUC = .86; optimal cut-off = -1.51), with a sensitivity of 89.7% and a specificity of 32%. BraincheX total scores correlated strongly with CERAD total scores (r = .73, p < .001). BraincheX demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbachs = .84). ANOVA confirmed significant group differences across all BraincheX subtests (p < .01). Additionally, individual BraincheX subtests showed strong correlations with their CERAD-Plus equivalents, such as the Clock Drawing Test (r = .73) and TMT-B (r = .48). DiscussionThese findings support BraincheX as a promising, accessible digital screening tool for cognitive decline, offering advantages such as automated scoring, immediate feedback, and reduced examiner bias. Its design promotes greater equity and inclusivity in cognitive assessment. Future research is underway to validate BraincheX in larger and more diverse populations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Screening for early-stage Alzheimer's disease using optimized feature sets and machine learning 96%
- The Association of Alzheimer’s Disease-related Blood-based Biomarkers with Cognitive Screening Test Performance in the Congolese Population in Kinshasa 96%
- Differences between plasma and CSF p-tau181 and p-tau231 in early Alzheimer’s disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Item-Level Responses to Cognitive Function Index with Tau Pathology and Hippocampal volume in The A4 Study 98%
- Self-reported word-finding complaints are associated with cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid and atrophy in cognitively normal older adults 96%
- Delayed primacy recall performance predicts post mortem Alzheimers disease pathology from unimpaired ante mortem cognitive baseline 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Healthy Brain 9 (HB9): A New Instrument to Characterize Subjective Cognitive Decline, and Detect Anosognosia in Mild Cognitive Impairment 97%
- Relationship between finger movement characteristics and voxel-based specific regional analysis systems for Alzheimer’s disease 96%
- Examining heterogeneity in dementia using data-driven unsupervised clustering of cognitive profiles 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between motor task acquisition and hippocampal atrophy across cognitively unimpaired, amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease individuals 96%
- Towards the development of a management protocol for Subjective Cognitive Decline: insights from a cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of multimodal clinical data 95%
- Sex Differences in Cognitive Performance in Alzheimer's Disease: Insights from the ADAS-Cog-13 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.