Back

Vibrational noise pollution in bee hives generated by railway traffic

Chehaimi, S.; Seidel, M. C.; Richter, J.; Kirchner, W. H.

2025-07-18 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.07.15.664893 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Anthropogenic noise pollution has become a threat for the fauna with possible effects on animal physiology and behaviour. We explored the effects of anthropogenic vibrational noise on honey bees (Apis mellifera). The intensity of substrate borne vibrations generated by trains on the ground, on the front comb of a hive and on its base as well as the airborne sound pressure were recorded at different distances and sites. Vibrational noise of amplitudes that can be detected by honey bees is present on the ground surface, on the comb and on the base over distances up to 20 m from the railway track and the attenuation of the airborne sounds is higher than the attenuation of the substrate borne vibrations. Bees placed in an observational hive and exposed to simulated substrate borne vibrations caused by a cargo train show significant behavioural reactions. The same substrate borne vibration was presented to bee colonies every 5 minutes continuously for six months at realistic amplitudes. On the colony level no differences are found for capped and open worker brood, worker eggs, adult drone population, capped and open drone brood, brood development, varroa mites, collected pollen and honey production; while some significant differences are present for worker population and pollen collecting foragers. We conclude that honey bee colonies in the vicinity of railroads are exposed to substrate borne vibrational noise above their threshold of sensitivity up to 20 m. At the individual level bees show reactions to the vibrations; however, at the population level bees seem to cope with the disturbance. As higher amplitudes and additional stress factors might affect the colonies, it seems to be anyways advisable to generally avoid placing bee colonies close to anthropogenic vibrational noise sources.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.1%
4
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
5
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
7
Behavioural Processes
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
17
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Journal of Insect Physiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
22
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
23
Ethology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
28
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%