Effect of plasma treatment on the shear bond strength of ceramic and composite to human dental enamel
Shafigh, E.; sokhanvar, m.; shafigh, n.
Show abstract
Background and ObjectiveCold atmospheric plasma (CAP) has the potential to decontaminate and disinfect carious lesions without the need for mechanical preparation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of CAP on the bonding strength of composite and porcelain to enamel in an in vitro setting. Materials and Methods44 sound premolar teeth extracted for orthodontic purposes were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The first group CAP treatment (CAP group), while the second group did not receive CAP treatment (NO CAP group). Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups: one prepared for bonding with E-max porcelain (E CAP and E NO CAP) and the other for bonding with composite resin (C CAP and C NO CAP). In the composite subgroups, all samples were etched, rinsed and air-dried. They were then coated with a fifth-generation Kulzer bonding agent, light-cured, and subsequently bonded with composite disks (5 mm in diameter), which were light-cured again for 40 seconds. In the E-max subgroups, the enamel surfaces were etched with HF acid, rinsed, and air-dried. They were then treated with Bisco silane, followed by application of the fifth-generation Kulzer bonding agent. The E-max disks (5 mm in diameter) were bonded using a self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement and cured for 2.5 minutes. shear bond strength testing done using a Zwick/Rowell testing machine until debonding occurred. The failure mode (adhesive or cohesive) and debonding location were examined using a light microscope. ResultsFollowing plasma treatment, the median bond strength in the composite group increased from 88.7 to 92.6 MPa, while in the ceramic group, it increased from 174.5 to 187.4 MPa. Additionally, in the composite group, the number of cohesive failures increased from 3 in the NO CAP subgroup to 9 in the CAP subgroup. Similarly, in the ceramic group, the number of cohesive failures increased from 1 to 3 after CAP treatment. Conclusionthe effect of CAP on increasing cohesive failures in ceramics was not significant, whereas in the composite group, this effect was statistically significant.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Correlation of two different devices for the evaluation of primary implant stability depending on dental implant length and bone density: an in vitro study 95%
- Burnout: A Predictor Of Oral Health Impact Profile Among Nigerian Early Career Doctors 94%
- Oral Microbiota Interactions with Titanium Implants: A pilot in-vivo and in-vitro study on the impact of Peri-implantitis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Which surface treatment improves the long-term repair bond strength of aged methacrylate-based composite resin restorations? A systematic review and network meta-analysis 96%
- EGCG-modified bone graft to modulate the recruitment of M1 macrophage and alleviate the forming of fibrous capsule 92%
- Evaluation of RNA extraction free method for detection of SARS-COV-2 in salivary samples for mass screening for COVID-19 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trabeculae microstructure parameters serve as effective predictors for marginal bone loss of dental implant in the mandible 95%
- Electrospun cellulose acetate/gelatin nanofibrous wound dressing containing berberine for diabetic foot ulcer healing: in vitro and in vivo studies 92%
- RT-qPCR analyses on the osteogenic differentiation from human iPS cells: An investigation of reference genes 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the potential of marine invertebrate and insect protein hydrolysates to reduce fetal bovine serum in cell culture media for cultivated fish production 90%
- Periodontal inflammation mediates the link between homocysteine and high blood pressure 89%
- INTERCEPT pathogen reduction of platelet concentrates induces trans-arachidonic acids and affects eicosanoid formation 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.