Development of a pilot machine learning model to predict successful cure in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia
Zhu, M.; Liao, W.-T.; Peltekian, A.; Markov, N. S.; Kang, M.; Rasmussen, L. V.; Stoeger, T.; Walunas, T. L.; Misharin, A. V.; Singer, B. D.; Budinger, G. R. S.; Wunderink, R. G.; Agrawal, A.; Gao, C. A.; NU SCRIPT Study Investigators,
Show abstract
Severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a major cause of critical illness, yet there are no validated early clinical criteria to predict short-term treatment outcomes in these patients. Short-term pneumonia treatment outcomes are less affected by confounding factors introduced by a prolonged hospital course, and early prediction of short-term treatment outcomes can help physicians identify those who are likely to fail the current treatment and implement adjustments to existing diagnostic and therapeutic plans. Traditional clinical stability criteria such as Halms criteria are not calibrated for early outcome prediction in critically ill severe pneumonia patients. We applied the XGBoost algorithm to predict pneumonia cure by day 7-8 post- intubation with clinical features from days 1-3 in mechanically ventilated patients with severe CAP from the Successful Clinical Response in Pneumonia Therapy (SCRIPT) study, a prospective cohort study at a tertiary academic center. Pneumonia episodes were adjudicated for day 7-8 cure status by a panel of critical care physicians using a structured review process. Clinical features that inform Halms criteria, including vital signs, oxygenation parameters, mental status, and vasopressor use, were extracted from the electronic health record. We also examined model performance by including additional features, such as laboratory data, ventilator settings, and medications. Basic demographic characteristics including age and BMI were also incorporated. Among 85 patients, 42 (49.4%) were cured by day 7-8. The best-performing model, which used Halms clinical features and ventilator features from days 1-3, achieved a cross-validated AUROC of 0.757. Inclusion of lab and medication data did not significantly improve performance. Key predictors included GCS, norepinephrine requirement, and BMI. We prove the feasibility of using ML models to predict short-term treatment outcomes of severe CAP among critically ill patients with basic clinical features. Future studies should focus on external validation and clinical integration to inform prognosis and early reevaluation of treatment strategy in patients with predicted poor outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ABCDEF Bundle Implementation: The influence of access to bundle-enhancing supplies and equipment 92%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 92%
- A Transcriptomic Severity Metric that Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Surgical Sepsis Patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 94%
- Development and validation of a predictive model for critical illness in adult patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19 94%
- Machine learning in predicting respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia - challenges, strengths, and opportunities in a global health emergency 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Imputation of PaO2 from SpO2 values from the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database Using Machine-Learning Based Algorithms 95%
- Machine learning vs. traditional regression analysis for fluid overload prediction in the ICU 93%
- AKI Risk Score (AKI-RiSc): Developing an Interpretable Clinical Score for Early Identification of Acute Kidney Injury for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ICU and ventilator mortality among critically ill adults with COVID-19 92%
- An international factorial vignette-based survey of intubation decisions in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure 92%
- Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in patients with COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab in a randomised controlled trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Prospective Validation of a Transparent Deep Learning Algorithm for Predicting Need for Mechanical Ventilation 91%
- Rethinking Blood Eosinophils for Assessing ICS Response in COPD: A Post-Hoc Analysis from FLAME 90%
- Effect of Ventilator Mode on Ventilator-Free Days in Critically Ill Adults: A Randomized Trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.