Light stimulation system for measuring pupillary light responses based on Maxwellian view optical system using a retina presentation type viewfinder
Eto, T.; Yoshiike, T.; Utsumi, T.; Kawamura, A.; Nagao, K.; Kuriyama, K.; Kitamura, S.
Show abstract
PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility of applying a retinal projection viewfinder based on the Maxwellian view (MV) optical system for measuring post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) by comparing its performance with a typical LED-based optical system. MethodsTwenty-two healthy participants underwent pupillometry using both the MV-based viewfinder and a typical LED-based system. Monochromatic red and blue light stimuli were presented for durations of 1 and 10 seconds. Pupil responses, including maximum constriction, PIPR amplitude after 6 seconds from the light offset, area under the curve (AUC) values of PIPR, and sustained slopes, were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model to assess the differences between the two systems. ResultsThe MV-based viewfinder significantly enhanced net PIPR amplitude (p < 0.05) and sustained slope (p < 0.01) during 10-second light stimulation compared to the LED system, demonstrating its capability to effectively measure ipRGC-driven responses. In contrast, no significant differences were observed in the net AUC values. These results highlight that the MV-based viewfinder enables effective PIPR measurements by delivering constant and controlled light stimulation directly to the retina, minimizing the effects of dynamic pupil constriction during light stimulation. ConclusionsThe MV-based viewfinder showed feasibility as an effective method for measuring PIPR without requiring pharmacological dilation and technical knowledge to build the MV system. This innovative approach has significant potential for clinical and research applications in pupillometry. Translational RelevanceOur methodology provides practical solutions for dilation-free effective measurement of PIPR, accelerating its translation from experimental tool to routine clinical diagnostic.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Portable Six-Channel Laser Speckle System for Simultaneous Cerebral Blood Flow and Volume Measurement with Potential Application for Characterization of Brain Injury 94%
- Depth-targeted intracortical microstroke by two-photon photothrombosis in rodent brain 91%
- Multimodal retinal imaging by visible light optical coherence tomography and phosphorescence lifetime ophthalmoscopy in the mouse eye 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic Measurements of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements by Video-Oculography and Deep Learning-Based Object Detection 95%
- Low-cost, Smartphone-based Specular Imaging and Automated Analysis of the Corneal Endothelium 93%
- Establishing Fully-Automated Fundus-Controlled Dark Adaptometry: A Validation and Retest-Reliability Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeted spectroscopy in the eye fundus 93%
- A combined frequency domain near infrared spectroscopy and diffuse correlation spectroscopy system for comprehensive metabolic monitoring of inspiratory muscles during loading 91%
- Segmentation of the Urothelium in Optical Coherence Tomography Images with Dynamic Contrast 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spectral dependency of the human pupillary light reflex. Influences of pre-adaptation and chronotype. 94%
- Abrupt light transitions in illuminance and CCT result in different temporal dynamics and interindividual variability for sensation, comfort and alertness 94%
- Within-subjects ultra-short sleep-wake protocol for characterising circadian variations in retinal function 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.