A Comprehensive Prospective Cohort in Preventive Medicine: Protocol and Profile of the First 1,000 Participants in a Health Screening Program
Bauvin, P.; Benani, A.; Lepoittevin, M.; Sentilhes, M.; Bringer, M.; Lecheheb, D.; De Lucca, N.; Ohayon, S.; Dalle, C.; Tannier, X.; Vibert, E.; Steg, P. G.; Bodard, S.
Show abstract
The Zo[i] cohort is a prospective longitudinal cohort study, designed to advance evidence-based personalized prevention, by systematically screening for undiagnosed or asymptomatic conditions, identifying early risk markers, and predicting future disease risks. Conducted within a dedicated prevention-focused health center, data collection takes place in a standardized environment and combines over 500 self-reported items, clinical examinations, extensive biomarker profiling (196 biomarkers), and multimodal imaging (vascular, breast, abdominal, and pelvic ultrasound, full-body composition, retinal scan). For several major diseases, risk is further estimated through established clinical prediction models. Longitudinal follow-up is collected via yearly re-evaluations and through a dedicated application. This manuscript presents the cohort design and the characteristics of the first 1,000 participants. Participants (67.5% male, mean age 51.1 years, high education levels) exhibited a high level of health awareness, lower obesity and smoking rates than the general population, yet almost half (45.6%) of those who reported no known ongoing diseases had at least one undiagnosed chronic condition (i.e., either disease or risk factor), with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia being the most frequent. Male sex and older age were significantly associated with disease unawareness (p<0.05). These findings highlight a discrepancy between self-reported and objectively measured health status, even among a well-educated and health-conscious cohort. This deeply phenotyped, longitudinal cohort will serve as a platform that supports interdisciplinary research collaborations. It will enable development and validation of early risk stratification models, essential for predictive medicine, as well as evaluation of preventive interventions, to advance evidence-based precision prevention in public health settings.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Precision Prognostics for Cardiovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 92%
- Estimating Heritability of Glycaemic Response to Metformin using Nationwide Electronic Health Records and Population-Sized Pedigree 90%
- Comparing DXA and MRI body composition measurements in cross-sectional and longitudinal cohorts 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participants 94%
- Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection from administrative data: a population-based cohort study from Italy 93%
- Prevalence of uncoupling protein one genetic polymorphisms and their relationship with cardiovascular and metabolic health 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- biobank.cy: The Biobank of Cyprus past, present and future 94%
- Identification of metabolomics biomarkers for type 2 diabetes: triangulating evidence from longitudinal and Mendelian randomization analyses 94%
- Environment-wide association study (EWAS) on cardiometabolic traits: A systematic assessment of the association of lifestyle variables on a longitudinal setting 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using machine learning to evaluate the value of genetic liabilities in classification of hypertension within the UK Biobank 93%
- Exploring the Association Between Urinary Incontinence and Depression Based on a Series of Large-Scale National Health Studies in Turkiye 92%
- Polycystic ovary syndrome susceptibility loci inform disease etiological heterogeneity 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.