Randomised evaluation platform, interventions to treat older people with sarcopenia (REVITALiSE): protocol and description of intervention selection process
McDonald, C.; Watts, P.; Atkinson, H.; Polyma, M.; Sayer, A. A.; Spiers, G. F.; Nesworthy, J.; Robertson, E.; O'Keefe, H.; Wason, J.; Wilson, N.; Witham, M. D.
Show abstract
IntroductionSarcopenia is the age-related loss of muscle mass and strength. It is associated with significant adverse personal and health-economic outcomes. Despite advances in understanding the biology of muscle ageing, effective treatments remain limited. Exercise is currently the only proven intervention, but many older people are unable or unwilling to sustain the intensity of exercise required to gain results. Consequently, there is a major unmet need for new therapies. REVITALiSE is an early-phase experimental medicine platform trial designed to efficiently evaluate promising interventions in people with sarcopenia. By identifying and selecting the most promising interventions to progress to large randomised controlled trials, REVITALiSE aims to accelerate the development of effective therapies for this under-served population. Methods and analysisThe REVITALiSE platform comprises a series of parallel-group, individually randomised, controlled, open-label, proof-of-concept subtrials. Each subtrial will enrol 30 participants aged 65 years and older with probable sarcopenia, defined according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) guidelines. The platform is designed to evaluate a range of interventions, including exercise-based approaches, device-based therapies, and nutraceuticals. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the intervention or usual care. The primary outcome, analysed in a modified intention to treat (mITT) population, is the between-group difference in four-metre walking speed between baseline and 12-week follow-up. Secondary outcome measures specified in the master protocol include handgrip strength, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and lean muscle mass (assessed by Dual X-ray absorptiometry). Muscle biopsies of the vastus lateralis will also be taken at baseline and follow-up. Additional mechanistic outcomes will be determined by the proposed mode of action of each intervention and specified in the relevant subtrial annex. Adverse events will be recorded for the duration of the trial. Ethics and disseminationUK Health Research Authority and Northeast - Tyne and Wear South Research Ethics Committee (IRAS 352708). Results will be made available to participants, their families, patients with sarcopenia, the public, regional and national clinical teams, and the international scientific community. Trial registration number: ISRCTN10801475 Protocol V1.0 08 May 2025 Sponsor: Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust REC: NE Tyne and Wear South NHS Research Ethics Committee ref: (IRAS 352708; ref: 25/NE/0115)
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of 12 weeks of Multi-nutrient supplementation on the Immune and Musculoskeletal systems of Older Adults in Aged-Care (The Pomerium Study): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 95%
- CATALYST trial protocol: A multicentre, open-label, phase II, multi-arm trial for an early and accelerated evaluation of the potential treatments for COVID-19 in hospitalised adults 94%
- Real-world effects of ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: protocol for an emulation study of the ONTARGET trial using electronic health records 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 95%
- The IGNITE Trial: Participant Recruitment Lessons Prior to SARS-CoV-2 93%
- The Helping Older People Engage (HOPE) Study: Protocol & COVID Modifications for a Randomized Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The iHealth-T2D study: Statistical analysis plan for a cluster randomised controlled trial with intensive family-based lifestyle modification programme to reduce type 2 diabetes risk amongst South Asians 94%
- Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- Controlled evaLuation of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for COVID-19 respIraTorY disease (CLARITY): Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled Bayesian adaptive sample size trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 96%
- Connecting real-world digital mobility assessment to clinical outcomes for regulatory and clinical endorsement – the Mobilise-D study protocol 95%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-time Auditory Feedback for Improving Gait and Walking in People with Parkinson’s Disease: A Pilot and Feasibility Trial 93%
- Evaluating the Effect of Prebiotics on the Gut Microbiome Profile and β-cell Function in Youth with Newly-Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial 90%
- Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Development of the Cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.