Evaluation and Application of a Probability of Success (POS) Framework in Oncology Trials
Jiang, A. Z.; Sidi, Y.; Peng, X.; Jemielita, T.; Wan, S.
Show abstract
Oncology drug development encounters considerable challenges due to positive Phase I trials rarely leading to regulatory approvals, extremely competitive landscape, and high financial burdens associated with research and development. To enhance decision-making in this area and address high costs and risks associated with late-stage oncology trials, we developed a Bayesian decision-making framework by enhancing existing mWethodologies for estimating the probability of success (PoS) of these trials. We proposed a hierarchical Bayesian model that incorporates mixture prior weights from estimated benchmark probability of approval using machine learning methods, observed treatment effect from earlier studies, and the design features of Phase III trials for PoS estimation. We illustrated the adaptability of our framework to scenarios where prior data is available only from a single-arm study or when the earlier study pertain to endpoints that differ from the primary endpoint intended for the pivotal trial. We discovered through case and simulation studies that multiple factors affect the PoS predictions, including treatment effect uncertainty from earlier studies; and assessed the robustness of our model by varying the assumed correlation between the early study endpoint and the pivotal studys primary endpoint is important. Our framework was designed to facilitate a consistent evaluation of proposed oncology clinical trial designs regarding their statistical success, either within a specific program or throughout a pipeline portfolio. We anticipate that this framework will help streamline decision-making process for oncology pivotal trials from trial sponsors side, improve drug development efficiency and ultimately benefit patients.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-state network meta-analysis of cause-specific survival data 97%
- A Double Machine Learning Approach for the Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness under the Test-Negative Design: Analysis of Québec Administrative Data 94%
- Using generalized additive models to analyze biomedical non-linear longitudinal data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven Prior Elicitation for Bayes Factors in Cox Regression for Nine Subfields in Biomedicine 93%
- Using numerical modelling and simulation to assess the ethical burden in clinical trials and how it relates to the proportion of responders in a trial sample 93%
- Applying Historical Data in a Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Model Can Reduce the Number of Control Rats Required for Calculation of the Relative Potency of Insulin Analogues 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction-powered Inference for Clinical Trials 95%
- External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning 94%
- Comparison of Bayesian networks, G-estimation and linear models to estimate causal treatment effects in aggregated N-of-1 trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.