Employee Performance Appraisal Methods: A Scoping Review
ALIPANAH DOLATABAD, M.; Tehrani, P. N.; Pourasghari, H.; Sharfafchizadeh, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundEmployee performance appraisal is essential for improving healthcare service delivery through systematic staff evaluation. In the health sector, effective appraisals support decision-making and professional development. ObjectiveThis study aims to map and categorize existing employee performance appraisal methods in the health system using a scoping review approach. MethodsThis scoping review was conducted using the JBI 2024 protocol. Articles published up to December 2024 were identified through four databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The keywords used were "Personnel appraisal," "Health workers," and "Health workforce." Inclusion criteria focused on studies assessing employee appraisal methods in health systems. ResultsFrom 1245 initially identified articles, 42 met the inclusion criteria. Appraisal methods were classified into traditional and modern categories. Traditional methods included ranking, critical incidents, and graphic rating scales. Modern approaches involved 360-degree feedback, Management by Objectives (MBO), and Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS). ConclusionNo single appraisal method suits all healthcare environments. A hybrid approach tailored to organizational context and job roles is recommended. Emphasis should be placed on objective evaluation, customization, and rater relevance to improve performance outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 95%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 95%
- The Use of Machine Learning in Occupational Risk Communication for Healthcare Workers – Protocol for scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 96%
- Knowledge and practices towards COVID-19 during its outbreak: a multinational cross-sectional study 92%
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 93%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 93%
- Exploring Factors Affecting the Adoption and Continuance Usage of Drone in Healthcare: The Role of the Environment 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 94%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- ‘Leading from the front’ implementation strategies increase the success of influenza vaccination drives among healthcare workers: A reanalysis of Systematic Review evidence using Intervention Component Analysis (ICA) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.