Back

Orthorexia is associated with a paradoxical appetitive gastric response to unhealthy foods

Gumussoy, M.; Anisimova, E.; Lee, S.; Velummylum, A.; Cox, S.; Bagley, E.; Nord, C. L.; Dalmaijer, E. S.

2025-07-03 physiology
10.1101/2025.06.27.661259 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Orthorexia involves an obsessive tendency towards "healthy" foods. It is a risk factor for eating disorders (anorexia nervosa and the proposed "orthorexia nervosa") and psychological distress, but its biological mechanism remains unknown. We hypothesised that this mechanism operates through the stomach: increased gastric power differentiates appetising from unappetising foods, vagal stimulation reduces food liking, and gastric proto-nausea can be evoked by disgust; all contributors to disordered eating. We used electrogastrography alongside high-density facial landmark tracking to gauge responses to minimally processed ("healthy"), highly processed ("unhealthy"), and culturally unaccepted ("disgusting") foods in a non-clinical sample (N=77). Trait orthorexia was associated with increased self-reported desire to eat healthy foods. Moreover, we found that higher orthorexia was associated with increasing disgust-related facial responses to unhealthy and disgusting foods. We then identified a relationship between food-healthiness ratings and gastric power: those who generally assigned lower healthiness ratings to foods showed higher gastric power for unhealthy than healthy foods, whereas those who expressed higher healthiness ratings showed higher gastric power for healthy over unhealthy foods. This suggests that the stomach tracks individual differences in eating preferences. Crucially, and contrary to our expectations, higher trait orthorexia was associated with a paradoxical increase in gastric power to unhealthy foods. One explanation is that higher gastric power for unhealthy foods reflects increased appetite for self-denied foods. Alternatively, orthorexia itself could be an adaptive response to exert stronger cognitive control over a pre-existing gastric appetite for unhealthy foods.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.5%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.9%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.9%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 13%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
7
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.9%
8
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.2%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.2%
11
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.6%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
15
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
25
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
27
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
28
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%